Jump to content

3 Least Favorite Classics


Emmaline

Recommended Posts

We all have our favorites, but what are some of your least favorite classics?

 

I made myself finish The House of the Seven Gables by Hawthorne. He was overly verbose and never got to the point. He took 3 pages to tell us what a dead man looked like.

 

Through the Looking Glass Lewis Carol. Maybe I was just ready to move on to something else after reading Alice in Wonderland, but this just dragged on forever!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Torquato Tasso, Gerusalem Delivered - the. most. boring. epic. poem. of. all. time, period. A scene in particular stuck with me through the years: Crusader X had been fighting to the death with Infidel Y aka the Disguised Damsel; when she is wounded and her identity revealed, you'd expect an 'I've always loved you! Here, die in my arms,' tearjerker, but no: her last words to the Christian she's always loved in secret are not 'I love you' or 'Kiss me' but 'Convert me'... what?!?!?

 

D.H. Lawrence, Lady Chatterley's Lover - sure, the man can write but could he have been any more disgustingly mysogynistic? And no, it's not the time he wrote in, because otherwise Shakespeare wouldn't (several centuries earlier) have been able to write from a believable female perspective, as he does in Twelfth Night and Two Gentlemen of Verona, for instance.

 

I'll have to think about #3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong Bronte, but I agree, I wanted so much to enjoy that book. I have started it so many times and finished it twice, but every time I am bored with it. I have seen the 06 movie several times and always enjoy it. I love the story, but I think the writing is what bored me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first one is easy: Tess of the d'Urbervilles by Thomas Hardy. Boring, boring, incredibly boring, and incredibly depressing. And I don't care that the woman was a victim of her age and I guess couldn't defend herself as she would've been able to do in the modern society? I felt no compassion towards her because she was a miserable wimp who let everything happen to her. I hate that book with a passion and only struggled to finish it because it was on my English lit course. It totally put me off Thomas Hardy, forever.

 

The second one would be Lady Chatterley's Lover. I guess that book was really exciting in it's own days, but if I'd been living that time, I would've felt betrayed because it was supposed to be very courageous and yet I don't think there was that much sex. It was boring. I have to admit I was merely skimming through some of the pages, I couldn't bring myself to read every single boring word.

 

The third one? I have to think about that. I don't think I've read a third yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first one is easy: Tess of the d'Urbervilles by Thomas Hardy. Boring, boring, incredibly boring, and incredibly depressing. And I don't care that the woman was a victim of her age and I guess couldn't defend herself as she would've been able to do in the modern society? I felt no compassion towards her because she was a miserable wimp who let everything happen to her. I hate that book with a passion and only struggled to finish it because it was on my English lit course. It totally put me off Thomas Hardy, forever.

 

Thank you! I couldn't even bring myself to finishing that one. I disliked the way Tess and her situation was described even more than I disliked Tess herself. I hated the way the Hardy kept on nagging about how pretty she was and how it seemed that that was to blame for everything. :)

 

Another one was The Agony and the Ecstasy (I can't recall the author at this moment). Boring, dull and dragging on and on and on and on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aw, I loved Lady Chatterley's Lover!

 

My least favorite classics are:

 

The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck...soooooo boring!!

The Bostonians by Henry James...the only Henry James book I've read, couldn't finish it, almost made me cry out of boredom. I will never read anything of his again!

 

I'm also not a fan of George Eliot. I've tried to read a few of her books, but haven't been able to finish any of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't even make it to the sexy parts of Lady Chatterley's Lover :roll: I found it so annoying and patronising, I threw it down in disgust.

 

I loved Grapes of Wrath too Kylie, a very moving story.

 

Lord of the Flies I found very disturbing, so it could go amongst my least favourites.

 

As a child I hated Peter Pan and Wendy, I found Peter an annoying little twerp and wished he would just .....GROW UP! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie by Muriel Spark (1961)

It’s seldom that I am quite as disappointed by a book as I was by The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie. I found the characters to be obnoxious (yes, all of them!) and found absolutely nothing to like in any of them. The stereotyping, both of Miss Jean Brodie and “her girls” was grotesquely cartoon-like and the plot entirely predictable – partially because all the major plot points are revealed up-front and the entire story is just one long-winded and stuffy study of the finer details.

 

Even if everything hadn’t been revealed at the start, I still would have found this a tedious story of air-headed, easily-led, gullible young girls, following blindly wherever their teacher leads. As for their teacher – she’s exactly the sort of person I wouldn’t want teaching any child of mine and she is the only person, I think, who is surprised that she is betrayed.

 

If it had been any longer, I wouldn’t have bothered finishing it.

 

2. Candide by Voltaire(1759)

This is quite possibly the most pointless book ever written and it's just dire from start to... well, I assume to finish, because I made it 3/4s of the way through and gave up because it was so awful.

 

The plot is absolutely preposterous. I have no problem with fantasies, but this was badly written and ill-judged on every level. I hated it so much that I've actually blocked most of it out and have difficulty recalling specifics in regard to this book.

 

3. The Water Babies by Charles Kingsley (1863)

Reading The Water Babies is like having a large quantity of morals and saccharine forced down your throat, and the constant digression (in particular, the one about salmon rivers; one of many digressions that seemed to have utterly no point!) makes it even more difficult to swallow.

 

The cloying condescension makes it even more unpalatable, as does the fact that if each meandering incident of digression and every lesson imparted to the reader were removed, we’d be left with a sweet story of about three pages in length.

 

This was very obviously written with an audience of just one in mind (constant personal references such as, “that’s more than you can do!” are certainly aimed at a specific young boy) and the rambling fairytale appears to have been constructed with the sole purpose of having him grow up to be a good, God-fearing man, which is all very well, but didn’t much endear it to me.

 

Overall, it was just far too sickly-sweet and moralistic (although the narrator claims the story has no moral on account of it being a fairytale – as if that ever made a difference to morals within tales!) to be completely enjoyable – I prefer not to be lectured while I’m reading!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe i managed to get the wrong Bronte thanks for the correction but i can't stand the film either i find heathcliffe just to awful for words and drives me mad, as for Cathy i just wanted to give her a slap and tell her to get over it..sympoathetic i am not..the only good thing to come out of the book has been the song by Kate Bush.

 

to all you Hardy lovers and haters i come firmly down on the side of the haters can't stand him..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie by Muriel Spark (1961)

It’s seldom that I am quite as disappointed by a book as I was by The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie. I found the characters to be obnoxious (yes, all of them!) and found absolutely nothing to like in any of them. The stereotyping, both of Miss Jean Brodie and “her girls” was grotesquely cartoon-like and the plot entirely predictable – partially because all the major plot points are revealed up-front and the entire story is just one long-winded and stuffy study of the finer details.

 

...

 

If it had been any longer, I wouldn’t have bothered finishing it.

utterly no point!) makes it even more difficult to swallow.

 

Yes!! Thank you. I had high hopes for that one, and what does the bloody book do? Reveal all the plot points up front, leave the reader to think there's more to the story and something big is going to happen, end then just discuss endlessly the finer details. What was Muriel Spark thinking? I never would've finished it had it not been such a short read and had it not been one of my English lit course novels.

 

That was my third. My special mention goes for The Lord of the Flies. Utter rubbish!

 

Scarlette, I think Thomas Hardy must've been madly in love with a beautiful woman who was wise enough to dump him at the get-go, and then the stupid smartypants had his revenge in the best way he knew how: wrote the Tess novel, the beautiful woman representing Tess, and then he made all these terrible things happen to her. And did it poorly at that. I have no idea why the book was published though. The publishing house must've been owned by smartypant's uncle who had a bad case of nepotism.

 

I also liked Grapes of Wrath, I didn't find it boring at all. That was also an English lit novel but I've reread the book on my own just because I liked it so much.

Edited by frankie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

I hate abandoning books and in general I love "classics", but I did give up on The Way of All Flesh by Samuel Butler and The Grapes of Wrath (life's too short) and I'll add Dante's Divine Comedy as my third vote.

Edited by Bel-ami
Link to comment
Share on other sites

D.H. Lawrence deserves to be on this page for the sole reason that he ruined the word "crisis" for me. That's just... wrong. It's hard narrowing down just three, but Moby Dick should get mentioned - the pacing and language never appealed to me, and having re-read it a couple of times I dislike it even further. I'll need to think more on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any Shakespeare really. I love watching the plays (or movie adaptations), but I find actually reading him incredibly hard.

 

I also struggled with Brideshead Revisited, but I think it might have just have been that it was not a book I was in the right mood for. I've kept my copy anyway, with the intention of reading it again another time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like others, I enjoyed Grapes of Wrath. I also never read Tess of the d'Ubervilles, but I saw the mini-series last year and practically hated it! I probably wouldn't like the book either :lol:

 

To be honest, I can't really recall any classics I dislike, but there's still boatloads that I haven't read. I do know that after trying to read Emma and Sense & Sensabilites, that I enjoy seeing Austen's stories portrayed on screen much more than in printed form. That's not to say I won't attempt to read others by her. You never know, maybe I just wasn't in the right frame of mind at the time.

 

Oops, just thought of one. Is 'Far from the Madding Crowd' considered a classic? If so that would be my #1 dislike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Villette & Shirley by Charlotte Bronte I couldn't finish either of them & Mill on the Floss by George Eliot mainly because I couldn't stand the Tulliver family, what a luckless bunch :rolleyes:

Edited by Kidsmum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any Shakespeare really. I love watching the plays (or movie adaptations), but I find actually reading him incredibly hard.

With Shakespeare I believe it's just a case of getting in to, and accustoming yourself with, the writing. It's different, and sometimes difficult to read and understand. I've studied two texts written by Shakespeare, Hamlet and Much Ado About Nothing both of which I really enjoyed. Initially I thought I'd hate Shakespearean texts, but in fact, I rather like them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd agree with those who disliked Lord of the Flies: possibly my most hated (yes, as strong as that) book to date.

 

Others I have positively disliked:

The Great Gatsby: what was the point? Did I care? Did I heck.

Moll Flanders: great on TV, wooden, repetitive, overdetailed in the book.

Justine (Alexandria Quartet): pompous, overblown and totally pleased with himself (pretty much how his brother seemed to rate him in My Family and other Animals, and easy to see why).

I'm sure there are others, but those will do for the moment!

Edited by willoyd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...