Chrissy Posted October 22, 2009 Share Posted October 22, 2009 I thought perchance that was the case. I find whenever I read little bits like this, my heart just sinks and I feel a bit of the collective human spirit being diminished by it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catwoman Posted October 22, 2009 Share Posted October 22, 2009 Dear god!!! Let the poor woman sing!!! they should look at it as free advertising of the songs. Are you going to have these people walking the streets at Christmas time handing out fines to Carol singers saying that they need to get a licence. Give me a break Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weave Posted October 22, 2009 Share Posted October 22, 2009 Guess I'd be buying a few bridges as I'm an American and I watched in horror and dismay, praying for this little boy and his family. When this story first aired, the details of the ballonhad not yet been disclosed. All we saw was a distraught family and a silver balloon in the air. It is not something we generally we jump up and say, "oh, its a hoax". And since an object HAD fallen from the balloon, it was evident that it could have held "something". Yes and still, I'd rather be a little guilible and tenderhearted then hardened. But thats just me. Now the family will have the Department of Social Services come in and question the children and they may be removed from the home because of a need to be in front of the camera for 15 minutes of fame. Add to THAT, we the citizens will be paying for this stunt for a few years. I was the same Katrina, I was shocked when I heard it on the news initially, all I could think was 'that poor wee boy and family', I am very gullible at times and I believed this story, I feel so bad for everyone involved that it has turned out to be a hoax. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephanie2008 Posted October 22, 2009 Share Posted October 22, 2009 If this is true this is ridiculous aswell. Wine Gums Thats funny. It would be good if Wine Gums had wine in them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 "…"We have asked that children do not bring cakes and sweets into class on their birthdays because not every child is able to do so and we like to be fair to everyone.…" http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/howaboutthat/6406373/School-bans-birthday-cakes.html I find it quite sad how much of a petty nanny state this is becoming... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephanie2008 Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 I can understand what they're trying to do but surely, from that quote you put their Ghost, it would be a good thing then for children to bring things in so all children can share them. When it was a birthday in our school, we never brought any cakes in anyway. We just used to sing to the person, or let them go first for their break Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 Indeedy, I always used to take things in to school on my Birthday and into the office when I was older. And if people didn't then nobody had a pop at them for it.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ned Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 We used to do it when i was at at school until someone had an allergic reaction to something and almost died. My niece is at the school nowand it still isn't allowed almost 15 years later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightwish Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 The poor guy http://mytechnologyworld9.blogspot.com/2009/10/real-life-harry-potter-reveals-why.html at least nobody will ever forget his name though I'm just going to pretend I never saw the photo at the bottom of him pretending to...rip...up...the...book Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrissy Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 I'm just going to pretend I never saw the photo at the bottom of him pretending to...rip...up...the...book He's....he's.....huuuurrting the book! I reckon he should either change his name, or embrace it. It seems silly getting all work up about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephanie2008 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 I can imagine that it would be hell growing up with that name, especially as he's about the same age as Daniel Radcliffe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceinwenn Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Dear god!!! Let the poor woman sing!!! they should look at it as free advertising of the songs. Are you going to have these people walking the streets at Christmas time handing out fines to Carol singers saying that they need to get a licence. Give me a break Actually, the Christmas carol singers do have to get a license! They have to purchase it from their local council! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed. By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Editor Published: 6:42PM BST 23 Oct 2009 The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett. He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote". As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants. Critics said the revelations showed a "conspiracy" within Government to impose mass immigration for "cynical" political reasons. Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s. Writing in the Evening Standard, he revealed the "major shift" in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001. He wrote a major speech for Barbara Roche, the then immigration minister, in 2000, which was largely based on drafts of the report. He said the final published version of the report promoted the labour market case for immigration but unpublished versions contained additional reasons, he said. He wrote: "Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural. "I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janet Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 The poor guy http://mytechnologyworld9.blogspot.com/2009/10/real-life-harry-potter-reveals-why.html at least nobody will ever forget his name though I had to laugh at a) the fact he's styled his hair exactly like the Harry on the book cover (he might as well go the whole hog and buy some glasses) and he's looking cross... but he doesn't actually look cross at all - he looks like someone trying to look cross! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 I had to laugh at a) the fact he's styled his hair exactly like the Harry on the book cover (he might as well go the whole hog and buy some glasses) and he's looking cross... but he doesn't actually look cross at all - he looks like someone trying to look cross! He also looks like someone who isn't strong enough to rip that book in two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janet Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Yeah, that's true! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 I am almost tempted to find him on FaceBook and mock him. But there are over 500 Harry Potter's and I have not the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kell Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Why focus on just that one Harry Potter? I'm sure all the other Harry Potters get the same amount of flack, so this guy just seems like a whinger who deserves mocking because of this. If he'd just got on with things he wouldn't have looked and sounded like such a numpty! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beef Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 The Boy needs mocking. if he feels so bad change it. or embrace it. one of the two. The boys missing out on a world of chat up lines relating to his "magic wand" . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrissy Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 The Boy needs mocking. if he feels so bad change it. or embrace it. one of the two. The boys missing out on a world of chat up lines relating to his "magic wand" . You are so right, but so naughty! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beef Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 You loved it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrissy Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 You loved it. I certainly laughed! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beef Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Warner Bros insanity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 <H1>German brothel offers discounts to cyclists A Berlin brothel has come up with a novel way to offset the impact of the global economic crisis and target a new group of customers at the same time - offering a discount to patrons who arrive on bicycles. </H1> Published: 12:59AM BST 14 Jul 2009 "The recession has hit our industry hard," said Thomas Goetz, owner of the Maison d'envie brothel. "Obviously we hope that the discount will attract more people," he added. "It's good for business, it's good for the environment - and it's good for the girls." Customers who arrive on bicycle or who can prove they took public transportation get a 5-euro ($7) discount from the usual 70-euro ($100) fee for 45 minute sessions, Mr Goetz said. He said the environmentally friendly offer was working a charm. "We have around 3-5 new customers coming in daily to take advantage of the discount," he said, adding the green rebate has helped alleviate traffic and parking congestion in the neighbourhood. Germany is one of the few countries in the world where prostitution is legal. It has about 400,000 prostitutes who, since 2002, have been allowed to enter formal labour contracts. Hahaha "To gain advantage of the discount customers must present their helmet at the desk". Yeah I'll bet! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5821953/German-brothel-offers-discounts-to-cyclists.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bethany725 Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Bless it.. Pick your battles, WB. Kinda ridiculous? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.