I had a thought with reference to the talk of how this book had really bad reviews & I think that the people who are reading the book just don't get it. They talk about the lack of character development, but I honestly think that the characters are developed as much as they need to be. To me, the characters are secondary to the story, that is being told, if that makes sense. In a lot of books the story is about the characters, but in this book, the characters are secondary to the story that the books is about. Does that make sense, or am I crazy?