You know, one of my colleague's relatives works as an investigator for people who have been sentenced to death in the US. Apparently to try and ensure that no innocent is put to death each person sentenced gets several dedicated lawyers, as well as social investigators for at east a year, during which they work full time to bring forward a case against the sentence. I don't have figures, but apparently the whole scheme, as well as the cost of actually carrying out the sentence, is much higher than that of keeping the person in prison.
But whatever the figures are, I don't think money should be the deciding factor... Yes it's enraging that such people should cost so much but we're speaking of a life there and I don't think we can sentence someone to death just because it 'costs too much' to keep them alive.
Well, I can certainly understand that. But in a way, that's the problem. Giving someone, through the judiciary system, the power to act upon these vengeful feelings (and I've had them as well) can only lead (imo) to tragic mistakes.
I'm not trying to get in an argument here, but I was surprised and a little shocked to see only reactions applauding that sentence. We are lucky enough to live in countries were lots of people have fought against the death penalty and the tragedies it brought with it. It seems dangerous to fantasize about reinstating it.