Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I still haven't seen Twilight, but I wasn't especially impressed by the book. Will probably see it at some point though. I thought the P.S I love you film was pretty good, but nothing compared to the book, and they changed so much!

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I still haven't seen Twilight, but I wasn't especially impressed by the book. Will probably see it at some point though. I thought the P.S I love you film was pretty good, but nothing compared to the book, and they changed so much!

 

Yeah that's why I didn't like it, they changed it too much for my taste, but Gerard Butler was a nice addition as was Jeffrey Dean Morgan :D

Posted

They changed a lot! Gerry was actually in it for one thing, and it was set in America (which is the change I was most annoyed about). And there were a few other big changes which I won't mention cause it will give things away

Posted

I might see the shopoholic one, although they are by no means my favourite books. Are they planning on doing all of them does anyone know? How would shopoholic abroad work if she's already in America?

Posted

I'm really disappointed that they set the Shopaholic movie in New York instead of London. I didn't like the book, and I probably won't see the movie, but this change seems so unnecessary!

Posted

Yeah it really does seem unnecessary. They did the same with P.S I love you, if anything it took away from the story in that

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I'm sick of being excited about movies made from amazing books. I should have learnt by now that they're most likely going to be shizzle.:)

Posted

the point is that ther's no way you can (magically) turn a book into a film. the film will always be...another thing. each has its own peculiar way of being, of dealing with the spectator/reader. they shouldn't be compared as if they belonged to the same category. they don't anyway. the time allotted for each of them is different, the way a film can use lyrics to convey a message which is hidden or implicit in the book. the only point which is shared is the underlying facts, not even the story, because often this is bent to please the viewers. I don't say you can't appreciate a film which is based on a book, I only say go to the theather without expecting to feel what you felt reading, because this will never happen.

Posted

Have you ever found a film (or I suppose TV adaptation) as good as the book?

 

I've never seen a Wuthering Heights to beat the novel. Recently I've read and seen:

 

Wonder Boys

No Country For Old Men

 

In both cases the films were more compelling.

 

With A Passage to India it was the other way round - the film didn't come up to the novel.

Posted

I could never get into Lord of the Rings, but love the films...I will probably try to read it again at some point though

Posted

I recently bought No Country For Old Men. I saw the film twice, it was amazing. First movie in a long time to have me literally on the edge of my seat, ducking when I didn't want the main character to be seen :smile2:

 

I'll be disappointed if the book isn't very good :tong:

Posted

The Merchant Ivory films of both Howards End and A Room With A View by E. M. Forster are both superb adaptations.

 

I also think the Emma Thompson adaptation of Sense and Sensibility is as good as the book.

Posted

I've just seen 'Watchmen' and have never seen a film remain as faithful to the source material. The casting was excellent, the script was practically lifted from the novel and a lot of the shots were also taken from images within the novel. Great stuff. I'm not even a fan of graphic novels! Bonkers, innit?!?

Posted

Atonement was a freaking amazing adaptation. Sense and Sensibility was good but could have been a little better. And as for Wuthering Heights, the 1939 adaptation was horrible, but they were planning to make a new one, so if this happens, let's hope it will be good

Posted

I think there was another similar topic some time ago (Books to movies: http://bookclubforum.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5093).

 

From which I quote myself :

 

"the point is that ther's no way you can (magically) turn a book into a film. the film will always be...another thing. each has its own peculiar way of being, of dealing with the spectator/reader. they shouldn't be compared as if they belonged to the same category. they don't anyway. the time allotted for each of them is different, the way a film can use lyrics to convey a message which is hidden or implicit in the book. the only point which is shared is the underlying facts, not even the story, because often this is bent to please the viewers. I don't say you can't appreciate a film which is based on a book, I only say go to the theather without expecting to feel what you felt reading, because this will never happen."

Posted

My youngest wants to go and see it but I'm refusing (so far!) cos I know I will cry...I've read the book I know what happens I can't put myself through it again can I?

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...