So true.And it's actually true for Coelho's work in general.
I'm one of those who love the book,and it's for most of the reasons the author of the thread/review stated as negative.
I love the simplicity of it,I don't think the more complicated the message is,the better - on the contrary (in this case). In my opinion,Coelho left out all the unnecessary details (yes,I'm not saying description is bad or unnecessary,nor are details such as names,age etc,I mean,were it not important,what the hell would Proust do ) - unnecessary for him to get the message out.Also,for some strange reason,I enjoyed not knowing what year it was set in,it seemed to make the point timeless.
Like most of his books,it was very picturesque to me.I could picture everything,and it was vivid enough.
Yes the characters too are very,umm,how shall I put it,very 1D instead of 3D lol,simple if anything,but once again,I didn't mind.
All of the things I've mentioned are things I would probably appreciate in other writers books (details,deep and complex characters etc),but in PC's case,I enjoy the opposite.
The alchemist has all the characteristics of a typical PC novel (all the above^^ plus some more),but what I'd also like to point out - it's also one of his earliest works.So,he got even better with time