It was a bit of a mixed bag, but it has promise, I think.
I liked the interview with Chris Evans, and was interesting to hear him talk about how the writing was almost effortless once he found his voice.
The Cecilia Ahern segment seemed a bit pointless - a bit like blowing their own trumpets to remind us just how important the R&J Bookclub had been.
Loved the Mark Watson video - entertaining and informative (I'm sure I'll be using one of those words on another thread shortly )
Slightly disappointed by the review of Sarah Waters book - thought the video of her talking about the book was too long in comparison to how much the panel talked about it, and would have preferred to have had a longer discussion on the book itself. I also think it needed someone to lead the discussion instead of each person just putting in their opinion randomly. Having said that, thought Nathaniel Parker was the best of the reviewers, Jo Brand and Dave Spikey were pretty good (but both possibly a bit reticent as if they didn't want to hog the limelight), Gok Wan was just annoying and Laila Rouass was virtually non-existent. But the main issue was that it wasn't long enough.
If it was down to me, I'd have dropped the Cecilia Ahern segment, reduced the length of the Sarah Waters video and had one of the presenters lead the discussion on the book review, but on the whole, it wasn't too bad and I'll stick with it to see how it progresses.