'The Rebel' Albert Camus

[sirinrob]

This is a book length essay, published in 1952. In it Camus reviews his philosophy of the Absurd, which he had presented in the 'Myth of Sisphyus' some 10 years earlier. This review leads Camus to conclude that his previous position was largely untenable.

 

From this he proceeds to define rebellion and revolution. Moving on he critiques the French revolution of 1783 and presents conclusions which are at odds with the preceived wisdom of his time, but are eventually proved by the French historian Francois Furet. Next he turns his attention to Nietzsche and Hegel. He largely defends Nietzsche, bar some specific criticisms. However he is not so forgiving with Hegel, particulary Hegel's view on history. Since Hegel influenced Marx, Camus's critque extends to Marx as well.

 

The main concept that Camus attacks is communism. Prior to publishing this essay he had criticised communism; here he rejects rejects it. The essay is finished off with some concluding thoughts.

 

The publication of this essay caused a furore in France. The French Left, centred around Sartre, were incensed. A 'courteous' review appeared in the Left wing monthly publication 'Les Temps Modernes' the reviewer Jeanson was far from courteous, making scathing comments on the content. Camus responded, his response being addressed to 'Monsieur Director'; a direct attack on Sartre. In the response Camus defended his position, and was in places sarcastic. Sartre, who had wanted to keep out of the squabble, was furious. He wrote a 19 page article, berating Camus for criticising the french revolution and communism, both of which were sacred cows for the Left. Personal attacks were included as well. The feud between Sartre continued up to Camus's death in 1960 and beyond.

 

Overall I agree with Camus's views, but some of the details I need to reread to come to a definitive conclusion. This is a very interesting essay and one I'll be returning to.