probooklover Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 i could never set a time limit. some books you can rattle through in a day, some can take weeks. setting a limit seems a bit arbitrary i do pay attention to the rate though. the longer each page takes, the less likely i am to finish the book! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freewheeling Andy Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 I never set a limit for a number of reasons - firstly, books are all different - and they're also different to what you expect when you start them - so it's impossible to know at the outset how long a book should take you. And a book taking a long time doesn't mean it's a bad book. Often the best books are the ones that take the most effort and thought - and therefore require a closer, more patient, slower reading. But, also, it's impossible to determine outside factors, too, which allow you reading time. Clearly, for example, I read far, far more when I'm on holiday - particularly on long train and plane journeys - than when I'm cycling to and from work, working and not having much spare time at home on weekdays. But then, I never quite understood the obsession with just reading your way through a huge number of books. I'd rather read, and appreciate, in depth 10 or 20 really good, but perhaps dense, books, than churn my way through a book a day of fluff without bothering to actually stop and think much at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kreader Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 No time limit. I'll read as I please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottHughes Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 If I don't finish a novel in a couple weeks, I will start reading something else and will usually never go back without starting over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 If I don't finish a novel in a couple weeks, I will start reading something else and will usually never go back without starting over. A man more or less of my own heart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlette Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Time limits are too stressful, and even when I do set them, real life tends to interfere with my reading time so I never stick to them. Leisurely reading is more my thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beccles Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 No I like it to last as long as possible Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jewell Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 If I don't finish a novel in a couple weeks, I will start reading something else and will usually never go back without starting over. I must admit i don't like to leave big gaps between picking the book up, and if i do i will as you say, start from the beginning. But i do take as much time as i need on a book. I have had some i have 'lived in' and hardly put down until i've finished it, and others i pick up and read a little and then i put it down for a while in favor of knitting/card making or watching a film, so it takes me a longer. It depends on the book and on what other things are going on in my life. I make sure i spend some family time with my husband as a couple so i have to prioritize and even if i really want to pick up the book, i resist for the sake of more important things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawr Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 No time limit. I'll read as I please. This... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceinwenn Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 I can't afford to set time limits because work means they would never be adhered to. I just try to read as much as possible & hope that I enjoy far more than I don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bethany725 Posted July 13, 2009 Share Posted July 13, 2009 No time limit for me either. Some weeks I do just about nothing but read during the days, and some weeks I don't even get to pick up a book. A time limit just wouldn't work for me. Plus, I have to think I'm a bit like Kell... I think if I set a limit for myself, I'd end up avoiding it just because I don't like being bossed, even by myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nowhere_girl Posted July 19, 2009 Share Posted July 19, 2009 There are so many limits & structures we are forced to adhere to in our lives, so why on earth would anyone willingly do that with their leisure time? Reading a book shouldn't be like boot camp. Be spontaneous & random. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladymacbeth Posted July 20, 2009 Share Posted July 20, 2009 No time limit but after a certain amount of time I would probably give up or feel I had to start over. I prefer a real page-turner that is difficult to put down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BookJumper Posted July 20, 2009 Share Posted July 20, 2009 If I gave myself a time limit I'd never manage to finish anything, ever - what with life, the universe and everything I don't have much time to read and when I manage to find some I find it impossible to concentrate. I know this is a reflection on my state of mind rather than the quality of the book, hence it would be unfair for me to abandon the book for something that's not its fault. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kate Posted July 20, 2009 Share Posted July 20, 2009 I don't, but generally I read quite quickly anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 I never give myself a time limit. I am all over the map when it comes to reading time. If I gave myself a time limit I would only get disappointed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SueB Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Never.....I work full time and work unsociable hours so sometimes takes me a few weeks to read a book Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talisman Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Me neither - it takes as long as it takes ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blithe Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 No, I don't like being in a rush - reading a novel is supposed to be a leisurely pursuit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicola Posted September 2, 2009 Share Posted September 2, 2009 I've got too many deadlines at work/uni so the thought of adding one to the thing I do for leisure makes me want to run away! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted September 2, 2009 Share Posted September 2, 2009 Not usually. However I do find, if I'm still struggling with a novel after a certain length of time, I may move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nollaig Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 I don't usually set times for reading but my mojo has just been so all over the place that I think I'm going to have to make myself set aside an hour or so each day to focus on reading, and try to make a habit out of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirinrob Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 (edited) I never set a time limit for reading - most of the time I finish reading a novel fairly quickly - 2/3 days. Sometimes it takes longer if its a complex or really dense novel. The worst case scenario has been 'Being and Nothingness' by Sartre, but thats a special case as I want to be able to read 'The Rebel' by Camus and compare, so I have to go through the torment of Sartre, as the almighty row that erupted between Camus and Sartre rests on the 2 books. Edited September 3, 2009 by Nollaig Grammar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maureen Posted September 8, 2009 Share Posted September 8, 2009 Definately not! That would take the fun out of it!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BookJumper Posted September 8, 2009 Share Posted September 8, 2009 I never set a time limit for reading - most of the time I finish reading a novel fairly quickly - 2/3 days. Sometimes it takes longer if its a complex or really dense novel. The worst case scenario has been 'Being and Nothingness' by Sartrewhich isn't a novel, so your record is intact ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.