Jump to content

sirinrob

Member
  • Posts

    912
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sirinrob

  1. Though I haven't read The Alchemist yet, I have read Brida:), one of his later books.

     

    Like Brida has mentioned he writes in a deliberately simplified style. I found it engaging, and conveyed his points well.

     

    From the various comments alreay made, he is an author you like or hate; I like his work.

  2. I agree with what Bookjumper has said. I'm relatively inexperienced as a writer, but I have noticed that my style has improved as I've progressed further with my current writing project. I reread the first chapter last night. Whilst it captures what I want to say, it will need extensive revision to bring into line with later chapters and the overall style I have established.

     

    I've mentioned this on another thread but mapping out the concept of what you want to write is a useful technique.

     

    Happy writing! :lurker:

  3. Now I've read P&P, Sense and Sensibility, Mansfield Park, Persuasion, Northhanger Abbey and Emma, I'm in a better position to comment.

     

    I like her style, characterization and eye for detail. The only one I wouldn't read again is Emma as I found it tedious and the character of Emma herself annoying.

     

    So I do enjoy Austen :lurker:

  4. I do tend to expect no errors when reading a book so if i come across a grammar or spelling error im a bit annoyed. Obviously not enough to raise my blood pressure or anything, but still- proof reading should be taken seriously.

     

    If a book was riddled with errors i would simply stop reading it as its not my job to scan novels for errors, someone else should have done that.:lol:

     

    Well thats the stance I take, tried to read some awful books occasionally only to dispatch them to the recycle bin.

  5. I sympathise with that Kell. It is annoying and shouldn't happen , but as you know it does. I'm a little more lenient on translations, but some are so bad they are unreadable.

     

    I've found that the more obscure in terms of market presence, the better the proofreading/ editorship tends to be.

     

    As a society we seem to be putting quantity shipped ( read profit) above quality.

  6. In the case of books with mass appeal publishers seem to have the idea that they can push anything out the door so long as they make a profit. Sadly many of the target audience for such books, don't seem to spot the errors or simply don't care. They have the latest coolest book around and it earns them brag rights.

     

    BCF members are less tolerant of this trend, but I would suggest we are a minority in the face of the mass marketing publishing world.

  7. The kind of book I like really depends on the mood I'm in, so there isn't really any one thing about the content itself that would make me like/dislike a book.

     

    But the two things that can really spoil a book for me are poor proofreading (spelling, punctuation etc) or continuity errors. Some books look like they haven't been proofread or edited at all!

     

    Have to agree on the lack of proofreading/ editing. I may be inexperienced as a writer, but I do proofread my own work. Continuity errors are a bane of a writer's life, but with due care they can be eliminated.

     

    Some books I've read or more correctly tried to read were so poorly edited, they were in the recycle bin without being finished. Fortunately that's rare as I'm picky on what i read :lol:

  8. I've downloaded the Lite version of the 2010 spreadsheet today. Quick scan through and I've notched up 83 books, sure with a more detailed look I could bump that up a tad. Sticking with this one.

     

    Mulling over the possibility of turning this into a database, could extend the functionality quite easily ... hmmm

×
×
  • Create New...