Jump to content

Nollaig

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    12,029
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nollaig

  1. So a while ago my tavern wench costume arrived (for the medieval banquet me and partner/friends are going to in London in March). It's hard for me to get costumes that fit as I'm quite a hefty lady, so I was absolutely delighted that this fits pretty well! I need to get a new belt for it, and I'm thinking of getting a beer tankard purse, but overall it's great quality and I'm really happy!

     

    311.jpg

     

    I've also got a couple of pages from my ever-evolving gratittude journal. It started out really planned, and I was testing markers and watercolour pencils and stuff, but everything seeps through the pages. I'm also finding I'm not making the time to do the layouts I planned. So instead I'm taking a free and easy approach, just adding drawings whenever I feel like it. The main thing is that I find myself noting things to draw in it more often, which was the point - to be more grateful for even simple things.

     

    312.jpg313.jpg314.jpg

     

     

  2. 17 hours ago, willoyd said:

     

    I agree that the films did  the characters well - really enjoyed the whole series.  Perhaps the reason why the characters may not have come through for you was that Tolkien was writing this like a legend, even myth, and when one reads the Greek or Nordic myths, the characters are similarly assumed rather than developed.  I'm usually very much character driven in my reading, and for me they worked in this, but, as I said, I can see why they might not.

     

    I don't know, I think an awful lot of that is a surfeit of news media - avoid that and it's not half as bad as it looks, and no worse than it used to be.

     

    Hmm, that does make sense r.e. the characters. I've never heard those myths describe such perfect scenery either though!

     

    And I completely agree, the world is no worse than it ever was, it's just we have greater global access now. Imagine if social media existed during world war 2!

  3.  

    On 1/27/2018 at 4:02 PM, Marie H said:

    Watched Moomins in the Riviera and loved it:D.

     

    That’s good to hear/read. I’m getting into Studio Ghibli at the moment, and I now have DVDs to watch- Your Name and My Neighbor Totoro.

     

    On 1/27/2018 at 6:56 PM, Raven said:

    Studio Ghibli films are fantastic! They are all pretty good, but I'd recommend Spirited Away and Princess Mononoke.

     

    On 1/28/2018 at 12:06 PM, Athena said:

     

    I like both of those! They're quite different from each other, so what you want to watch might depend on your mood :).

     

     

    Just to note Your Name isn't Student Ghibli - it's by Makoto Shinkai. I make the distinction because I've been a fan of his for years, and Your Name is now the highest grossing anime film of all time, surpassing Spirited Away, so the distinction is important (certainly to him!) and also I think for crediting him appropriately. His films are superb, but tend to be lumped in with Studio Ghibli (a huge inspiration for him), but I don't really like Ghibli apart from Totoro and I adore Shinkai. Heartily recommend Five Centimetres Per Second, also by him,  and the OVA Voices of a Distant Star, which he animated and did the voice work for at home with his wife. 

     

    The last film I watched was the new Blade Runner with Ryan Gosling - meh. Before that, Arrival - excellent alien 'invasion' film focusing on attempts at communication using a world expert translator. Had the heart that Interstellar lacked while being pretty epic at the same time!

  4. Hi Trevor! Happy reading in 2018. I don't think there will be much overlap in our reading habits, going by the above books! I love the idea of sci-fi and fantasy but they usually leave me a little cold!

     

    That said, there's a couple of exceptions - the fairly soft space opera Radiance by Catherynne Valente. It's really not at all focused on the space elements, they just happen to be the backdrop for a story about disappearance, loss, stories, the search for truth etc. But it's very good.

  5. Well it's great that you're doing that Michelle, a lot of people probably wouldn't bother except under duress!

     

    Developing Leadership sounds scary to me, I am a quiet little sheep! Presentations are not fun, I've never liked doing them. Still though, at least it's not a wholly new subject, it's just building on what you already know and have experience of, so hopefully that will help :)

  6. 7 minutes ago, willoyd said:

     

    I've been thinking further about why The Lord of the Rings was a six-star read for me and, to try and  cut a long story short, I think it's because, unlike so much fantasy, I found myself totally immersed in it - finishing a reading stint was almost like emerging out of another world I'd been so wrapped up in this alternative one. Quite why it did that for me I'm not sure, and trying to dissect it to find out would probably be a bit futile, as any book one enjoys is surely a combination of factors, to do with plot, characters, setting, writing etc, and those factors vary (after all what makes LOTR a 6-star read for me is surely very different to what makes The Grand Sophy one, or, to pick another very different piece of fiction, To The Lighthouse!).  I think also time,place and mood are critical as well - after all why did it take 5 goes for me to start another favourite, David Copperfield, and yet on the sixth (attempted only because it was a reading group choice) I stormed through it?

     

    I was also probably spoiled a bit by the films - in the films I get a sense of Gimli's pride, Legolas's quiet self-assurance (the two of which turn into a death-count-battle in the third film!), Aragorn's nobility, Merry and Pippin's buddy-comedy pairing, Sam's loyalty etc. I got a bit of Sam's loyalty from the book alright, but little of the rest. Also, I love emotions in books, I love dark and scary, psychologically disturbing, heart-wrenching etc, and I still don't feel that was the focus of Fellowship. It's also why a lot of chick-lits don't appeal to me - writing characters that really speak to me is tough. Solace, by Belinda McKeon, is an example of a book that I adored and it was because I just got emotionally attached to the characters. On the flip side of all this, I also love straight up thrills, and will take them even with flat characters and ridiculous endings, like the endless 3-star thrillers I read. They're always 3-star reads, because they're just 'good', but they're so fun at the time!

     

  7. It depends on the book. For the most part, I usually imagine particular places/scenes. And these will often be different from what is actually described, my brain takes a general cue and goes with it. For example, in a series of books I've read with a character called Stacey, with a particular accent, I imagined Stacey Solomon, the singer from X-Factor, who has what I imagine to be a similar accent. Turns out book-Stacey is actually black. The latest book was based around hate crimes, and as such her colour became a focus and now I have a good mental picture of what she actually probably looks like. She's also pretty kick-ass, I'm glad she got a stronger part in the books. I definitely associate certain names with certain colourings - Vanessas are blonde, for example. I don't know why. Mikeys, Mikes, Mickeys, Michaels etc have dark short hair. (Thinking of examples from recent reads). Bridgets are red-heads, I grew up with a red-head Bridget! Almost no man has a beard unless explicitly stated in the book.

     

    I still remember the interiors of houses and landscapes I've imagined from other books. Hills, moors, warm cottagey kitchens and a living room with a wall of pure window/glass. The alleyway behind a row of houses where a murder victim was dragged (allegedly).

     

    In a book I finished yesterday, about a wasp nest, an ill baby and weird dreams the baby's older brother has, I can picture the bathroom, the older boy's bedroom window, the position of the nest on the house. The nest is on the right, as you're facing the house, around the corner by the roof, near a tree, and the tree is close to the brown wooden fence bordering the property. None of those details were in the book, just that the nest was under the baby's window. So I picture the baby's window being in the upside-down V the roof creates, and the nest under it, even though I know that's incorrect as there is an unused attic above the windows! 

  8. Belated happy birthday! I really enjoyed Miss Peregrine. Haven't seen the film - they changed a couple of core features, like one of the character's abilities, and that put me off a little. The book is worth it for the photographs, too.

     

    Chinese all-you-can-eat sounds great - I've only been to one, in Hamburg, and it was absolutely dire! We don't have much in the way of buffets like that where I live, and I LOVE food, so I was so excited to try it. Everything was dry and lukewarm, tasted like it had been sitting there all day. Hopefully someday I'll get to go to a good one! :lol:

  9. Yesterday I read The Nest by Kenneth Oppel, a middle-grade psychological horror. I know right?! As if kids that age aren't already suffering from anxiety enough :lol: But seriously, it was a really good read. 

     

    I also finished The Good People by Hannah Kent over the weekend, really enjoyed that too.

     

    Now reading The Chalk Man by C. J. Tudor, and really enjoying that too! Yay for a run of good books.

  10. On 1/27/2018 at 7:06 PM, Raven said:

    Lord of the Rings got better for me as it went along. Part of the problem with Fellowship, especially at the beginning, was Tolkien didn't really have a game plan and was making it up as he went! 

     

    Well, that definitely can't have helped!

     

    On 1/27/2018 at 9:33 PM, willoyd said:

     

    Well, it takes all sorts doesn't it?.  After all, I remember you giving The Girl on the Train 5 stars.......! ;)

    I've read LOTR twice now - once as a teenager and once about ten years or so years ago, and I loved it both times. Not unusual you may think given its status, but the fact is that normally I have absolutely no time for fantasy. Unlike @Trevor I've probably not properly grown up yet!   I struggle to say why it stood out for me - it has, inevitably, to be a combination of factors.  I suppose I liked the intricacy/depth of the world Tolkien created, the myth like qualities of the narrative, the strong direction of the plot/journey/quest (the 3 books make for one huge book, but Tolkien never seems, at least IMO, to lose sight of where he is going, even as threads split and converge) and for me the characters did have depth (I'm normally one of the first to shy away from books with cardboard figurines for protagonists). He is occasionally a bit clumsy, but, for me, it's one of the few fantasy books that deserves its place in the literary canon. 

    But then, I have just read and absolutely hated I Am Pilgrim, strongly recommended by a friend who normally I see completely eye to eye with when it comes to books (you think Tolkien's characters lack depth?!).  Conversely, I adore Jane Austen, and both my colleagues at work in the library can't abide her books - which makes for some great discussions!! No book or writer is so big or great that there isn't room for them to be disliked by at least some readers, thank goodness!

     

     

     

    Notably I rate books by how much I enjoyed them, not how objectively good I think they are, because I'm not qualified to do that. Hence a fluff book getting five stars when a literary classic did not. (ETA: When I say things like 'this just isn't very good', I don't always qualify them with 'in my opinion'. Coz that's what reviews are, opinions!) Same with books like The Essex Serpent. I can see the value, but I didn't really enjoy it.

     

    I love the intricacy and depth of the world, but that in itself I feel should have given the characters much more depth. For me, the physical journey seemed to take precedence over almost everything. The relationship between Arwen and Aragorn took about three sentences, whereas it could have been explored as it was in the film. I loved the dialogue, the big conversations when they happened, but I just felt it had very little heart. Or, what heart there was was obscured by descriptions of plant life! 

  11. I quite enjoyed the new season. I agree it probably wasn't as good as past series, but I did enjoy it. I really liked the helicopter parent episode. Watching that season also finally caught my partner's interest, and now we're rewatching all of it together. I'm so glad he's enjoying it!

×
×
  • Create New...