I've finally gotten through the first Jungle Book after having a lot of trouble getting into it. I'd like to blame outside influences but I think the truth is that if I was really enjoying it I'd have made more time for it. Having said that, I like to persevere to the end, so I'll be starting the second Jungle Book today - hopefully at this slow pace I'll still manage to finish it by the end of the month!
I'm also feeling a little silly because I had everyone's comments about racism in the back of my mind when I was reading it, but I just didn't see much evidence of it and I kept wondering what I was missing? There aren't too many referencese to the Indians at all, and apart from the obvious comment at the end of the last story about how the Afghans must come under English rule, I didn't see much else. Are the animals' stories supposed to be allegories?
The male/female seal bit didn't bother me, and I didn't pick up on the 'white' seal being their saviour. I just assumed that because most seals are, well, greyish, another colour was needed to distinguish Kotick (or whatever his name was)? And a white seal is unusual but plausible. Maybe I'm just being naive.
And as for the villagers' superstitions about Mowgli etc, I've heard of equally strange superstitions in far more recent times - never mind 115-odd years ago. It might sound strange to us but villages in African countries still burn witches and do goodness knows what else. Why wouldn't it have been the same in an Indian village over 100 years ago? I can't speak with authority on the subject because I don't know enough of India's history, but the whole thing sounded entirely real to me.
Like Kell, I'm not much enjoying the poetry bits either. I find them a little difficult to read and they're not particularly interesting. Otherwise, the stories themselves are OK, they're just not gripping me much.