Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Hayley

      Summer Supporter Giveaway   08/31/2020

      Going on a Summer Holiday (Sort Of...)     The summer giveaway for Patreon supporters is finally here and this time we're doing something a little bit different. I want supporters to tell me where you would go on holiday, if you could go anywhere. The winner will receive a bookish prize based on their answer!   Terms and conditions are as usual. Patreon supporters will be automatically entered into the giveaway and selected at random. As we're a little late this year the draw will be held on the second weekend of September. If you aren't currently a supporter but want to be involved in the giveaway you can sign up to support us here:   https://www.patreon.com/bookclubforum  
Hayley

Hayley's Reading in 2020

Recommended Posts

On 14/08/2020 at 8:44 PM, Raven said:

The world done and got sick on us... (in oh so many ways...).

 

 

In the words of River Song, spoilers:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Ah, I had forgotten about that!

Spoiler

I just remembered Peter and Beverley having a conversation, right at the end of the book, I think, about Peter's job being dangerous and then about the baby. I had totally forgotten that he was suspended anyway. Although this does now make me ask more questions about him popping in to the Folly to look at the police database... was he not suspended by then??

I didn't expect him to leave his job either (even though I forgot he was suspended!) I knew he would be drawn back into it, I think I just expected more to be made of the difference... if that makes sense... Peter working for a tech company and Peter working for the MET felt exactly the same.

 

On 14/08/2020 at 8:44 PM, Raven said:

I may have said this in my review (can't be arsed to go and look!) but I found all the Hitch-Hikers references a massive distraction and, as you say, unrealistic.  Someone would have thrown the copyright hammer at the company for such flagrant commercial use of the IP, if nothing else!  If the company had to be a bit geeky, he could have gone with names of computer pioneers, like Babbage, Lovelace and Turing etc. 

 

Although I enjoyed it, I think with distance I would mark False Values down as well, and give it 4/5 (though that might go up again on a re-read!). 

 

At the end of Lies Sleeping it felt like there was going to be a massive change in direction for the series, but that never really happened.  False Values feels like a side story before what comes next, although I think there may be parts of it that will prove to be very significant later...

 

You did say it in your review, I remember reading it now that you've said it. I was glad it wasn't just me being picky! I think using the names of computing pioneers would actually have made far more sense, given the context.

Reviewing this later did change my rating. I always just leave a star rating on Goodreads to add the book to my 'read' list and I gave it five stars at the time. You have a point about re-reading. I really don't know if I'd feel like it was five stars again if I did re-read. If I look back at the first book and the last though I definitely feel differently about them. As you say, False Value felt a bit like an in-between, as though it was just laying the groundwork for the next book(s). 

 

On 15/08/2020 at 4:27 PM, Marie H said:

Wow, you have had a read fest! And a review fest too :boogie:

 

I’ve still got a couple of the Peter Grant series books, but always seem to falter at Moon over Soho.... I can’t get into it :unsure:.

 

It looks a lot more impressive when you save them all up for six months :lol:

I agree with Raven that you could skip Moon over Soho and go straight to Whispers Underground. I really liked the third one and I don't think you'd miss anything that would make it confusing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Hayley said:

 

I agree with Raven that you could skip Moon over Soho and go straight to Whispers Underground. I really liked the third one and I don't think you'd miss anything that would make it confusing. 

Thanks Hayley & Raven, I will give Moon over Soho a miss, re-listenen to Rivers of London (which I loved), then read the 3rd. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Hayley said:

Ah, I had forgotten about that!

  Hide contents

Although this does now make me ask more questions about him popping in to the Folly to look at the police database... was he not suspended by then??

 

 

Spoiler

The way I read it, Peter has been reinstated by the time False Values starts, so he is able to go into The Folly again.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Raven said:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Oh! But...

Spoiler

Why did Peter start working for that tech company if he’d been reinstated?

Maybe I do need to re-read False Value!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Hayley said:

Oh! But...

  Hide contents

Why did Peter start working for that tech company if he’d been reinstated?

Maybe I do need to re-read False Value!

 

Okay, now you have me wondering whether I read the book right! 

 

Spoiler

Peter never worked for Serious Cybernetics; he was undercover from the start!  I'm sure there is a piece that explains how he was hired, and that his suspension was actually used as part of his cover story.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

 

Hi Hayley I think if you go back and read Falling Creatures you'll find out how Shilly and Anna first meet (and what happened to Shilly's first love and to an extent why this shapes her character), also why Shilly stayed with Anna.  I'm not sure how old Anna is either, probably not that old as in those days you probably didn't need to be that old to have bad teeth!  There's a definite slight other worldly feel to both books.  I really like them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 18/08/2020 at 9:14 PM, Raven said:

 

Okay, now you have me wondering whether I read the book right! 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

I definitely read it differently... I think I actually need to re-read the last two! I thought...

 

Spoiler

At the end of Lies Sleeping we don't know whether Peter will get his police job back or not. He says something to Beverley about how he could lose his pension, she implies she would actually like him to stop working for the police and reveals that she's pregnant. Then False Value starts with him at the interview for the Serious Cybernetics Company. I thought he was getting that job because he knew he might be losing his old one, but then got drawn into the police investigation into that company when it turned out to have a magical connection.

 

I've just flicked through False Value and I'm thinking maybe I missed the fact that it goes back in time after the interview? So had Peter already got his job with the police back before he even interviewed for the Serious Cybernetics Company? Maybe that's why I was so confused about why he so seamlessly started doing police work again!

 

 

 

On 19/08/2020 at 11:01 AM, Madeleine said:

Hi Hayley I think if you go back and read Falling Creatures you'll find out how Shilly and Anna first meet (and what happened to Shilly's first love and to an extent why this shapes her character), also why Shilly stayed with Anna.  I'm not sure how old Anna is either, probably not that old as in those days you probably didn't need to be that old to have bad teeth!  There's a definite slight other worldly feel to both books.  I really like them.

Yes I definitely felt like I was missing a lot of context from not reading the first book. I wish there had been something to suggest it was part of a series! I just felt like Anna was so unnecessarily unkind to Shilly, it's put me off getting the first one to be honest, even though I know it might all make more sense then. By the end I was kind of hoping...

Spoiler

Shilly would go with Mathilda instead! 

 There was a point where I wondered whether Anna's bad teeth were a sign of her bad childhood, rather than her age, but there are a couple of times when Shilly actually says she sometimes forgets how much older Anna is than her. I did like the other-worldly feel, that's really what attracted me to the book in the first place. I also thought the way the magpies connected various elements of the story was clever.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/24/2020 at 3:59 PM, Hayley said:

I definitely read it differently... I think I actually need to re-read the last two! I thought...

 

  Hide contents

At the end of Lies Sleeping we don't know whether Peter will get his police job back or not. He says something to Beverley about how he could lose his pension, she implies she would actually like him to stop working for the police and reveals that she's pregnant. Then False Value starts with him at the interview for the Serious Cybernetics Company. I thought he was getting that job because he knew he might be losing his old one, but then got drawn into the police investigation into that company when it turned out to have a magical connection.

 

I've just flicked through False Value and I'm thinking maybe I missed the fact that it goes back in time after the interview? So had Peter already got his job with the police back before he even interviewed for the Serious Cybernetics Company? Maybe that's why I was so confused about why he so seamlessly started doing police work again!

 

 

 

Spoiler

Yes, at the end of Lies Sleeping Peter is still suspended, but by the time the story gets to False Values he has been reinstated and gone under cover at Serious Cybernetics.

 

The blurb on the back of the book is misleading, as it implies Peter has got gainful employment outside the Police, and the beginning of the book keeps up that deception, but it doesn't last long and it doesn't really work very well for me either.

 

Edited by Raven

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Raven said:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

That does make sense now that I think about it. It's weird though...

Spoiler

that the blurb is so misleading. I don't see the point in making the reader think Peter isn't undercover at the beginning. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 14/08/2020 at 8:55 PM, Hayley said:

The Wind in the Willows by Kenneth Grahame - 4/5

This book has sentimental value to me because my great aunt gave it to me when I was little. It has a local newspaper name on the inner fold of the dust jacket, so I think she probably saved coupons from the newspaper to get it. Sadly she passed away a few years ago after suffering from dementia, but I have lovely memories of her. One of the things I loved about going to her house was playing in the garden. She had a long garden with a stream at the bottom, which was where (the adults told us) the fairies lived. So this book doubly reminded me of her, as the little animals navigated their boat around the streams and the big river. I expected it to be a very simple and potentially not very entertaining book as an adult, but I was very pleasantly surprised! The loveliest thing was the language and Grahame's descriptions of the natural world and changing seasons. It is really beautifully written and I can see now why it's considered a classic.

So, thanks auntie Peggy :)

 

Awww that's so nice that you have that copy still and that you have lovely memories of your great aunt :).

 

On 14/08/2020 at 8:55 PM, Hayley said:

Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury - 5/5 

If anybody ever doubts the importance of books to a society they should be made to read this book. It's quite hard to talk about the specific things I liked without spoilers but I thought it was very powerful and emotional, as well as being a very gripping story. The dystopian world Bradbury created has disturbing similarities to our own and I was particularly impressed by Bradbury's portrayal of human nature, both its good and bad sides. This is the kind of book that stays with you. The edition I had was an anniversary one (my sister bought it for me for my birthday) and I do think it's worth getting because it contains some interesting notes from Bradbury about what he would change about the book and how he imagined the background of one of the characters.

 

I bought this book some time in the recent months, glad to hear it was a good read for you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×