Lady Chatterley's Lover by D. H. Lawrence

[Kell]

I know it's a couple of days early, but I thought I'd set up the thread for discussing our Reading Circle choice for July - a hot and steamy novel to raise the temperatures for those of us having a not so hot British summer! :lol:

Lady Chatterley's Lover by D. H. Lawrence
Constance Chatterley feels trapped in her sexless marriage to the invalid Sir Clifford. Unable to fulfill his wife emotionally or physically, Clifford encourages her to have a liaison with a man of their own class. But Connie is attracted instead to her husband's gamekeeper and embarks on a passionate affair that brings new life to her stifled existence. Can she find a true equality with Mellors, despite the vast gulf between their positions in society? One of the most controversial novels in English literature, Lady Chatterley's Lover is an erotically charged and psychologically powerful depiction of adult relationships.

Some questions to consider:
1- Who was your favourite character and why?
2- Was there a particular part you enjoyed/disliked more than the rest?
3- Was this the first book you've read in this genre/ by this author, has it encouraged you to read more?
4- Were there any parts/ideas you struggled with?
5- Overall, was reading the book an enjoyable experience?

(You do not have to answer all, or indeed, any, of these questions, they are meant only as points for you to perhaps mull over as you read, and provoke more discussion. Please feel free to ask and answer any questions that come up as you read.)

I hope you'll all enjoy reading Lady Chatterley's Lover - I'm sure it will be a real conversation-starter!

[Maureen]

I was reading the introduction to this - it needed an introduction at the time to make sure that no one thought it was a dirty book. I bet no one would think of doing that in today's world.

[Echo]

I know that this book was banned for many years. It's not just the sex scenes between Connie and Mellors, but the frank discussion about sex, even in one of the first chapters that makes the book so provacative. I'm almost to page 100 now, and it's definitely heating up! The sexual tension between the two lovers is becoming intense.

[Maureen]

Not only that, Penguin were prosecuted under the Obscene publications act for publishing it. Fancy that!

[Lilywhite]

This is one of those books that you never knew if you were 'allowed' to read it or not. It's amazing that it was banned for so long and the effects one book can have.

[Kell]

I'm only a few pages in (I sneaked a peak while I was in the bath), so I'll not be giving away any plot points (hence no need to use spoiler tags), but I just wanted to mention that the instant impression that has come to me is that D. H. Lawrence had a profound respect for women, seeing them as intelligent, rational, capable creatures with an innate sense and love of freedom.

One quote that really leapt out at me from page 2 and gave me a warm chuckle was in mentioning the youth of Constance and her sister:

"The had been sent to Dresden at the age of fifteen, for music among other things. And they had had a good time there. They lived freely among the students, they argued with men over philosophical, sociological and artistic matters, they were just as good as the men themselves: only better, since they were women."

[Echo]

That's something I noticed as well. He seems to be really in tune with the way women think and shows a lot of respect for their capacities to think and feel. It often seems that he makes a point to show more derision toward the men in the book, equating them with the "society" that he obviously sees as flawed. It makes sense, too, because men were really in charge of that society.

[wrathofkublakhan]

First Impressions:
I just finished the first two chapters and I am enchanted by the writing style, the descriptions of how people are is very fun.
My copy has plenty of words emphasized by "quotes" and even some CAPS, which is uncommon today and pretty ...er ... quaint. Also my copy must be a text book since it has a huge opening section (which I skipped) and a huge introduction (which I skipped) and a lot of footnotes, explanations of unique words (bath-chair, for example) - I don't mind this at all.

I have no idea what happens in the book (yay-oh-yay) but my cover has a naked woman in a bed looking ... uh ... relaxed, with a man getting dressed in a white shirt as he looks at her. I'll take a picture later, maybe we can compare covers. Or ... between the sheets, lol. (sorry all)

[Purple Poppy]

If I remember rightly. Lawrence was very close to his mother, and was well aware of her lifestyle. So he was aware of womens' feelings almost inately.

I haven't started yet, as I can't find my copy. But I will do soon. This is the book which springs to mind when people talk of banned books. I prefer Women in Love and The Rainbow though.

Pp

[linda321]

I think I'll read this along with you this month. I have read it before (twice I think) but a long time ago. I have it in big DH Lawrence anthology. It will be great to discuss it with you all.

I like the idea of comparing covers! I guess the covers will have changed dramatically over the years!

[Kell]

My copy is one of the Wordsworth Classics series and looks like THIS (http://s95.photobucket.com/albums/l124/kell_smurthwaite/Reviews/?action=view&current=83-1.jpg).

I'm part way through Chapter 3 and have an observation to make, so I'll put it in spoiler tags for those who haven't got that far yet:

Although Constance seems to genuinely care for her husband, it surprises me that she shows absolutely no guilt over sleeping with Michaelis -even going so far as to say to Michaelis, "I don't want Clifford to know... not even to suspect. It would hurt him so much. But I don't think it's wrong, do you?"

She seems to be able to separate emotion and affection from the act of having sex in a way that isn't normally portrayed in female characters of this era -certainly not in such a sympathetic light.

I find this a very interesting approach, especially from a male author born in the tale-end of the 19th Century!

Of course, if you're past that point or don't mind seeing my thoughts before you read that point in the book, feel free to take a peek!

[Angel]

My library copy had a picture of a man (just the middle of his torso, no head etc) undoing his belt on his trousers. Rather to tthe main subject :lol:

[Lilywhite]

I have the Penguin version, a naked female torso covered with leaves. It's a bit obscure, but eye catching at the same time.

[Kell]

My library copy had a picture of a man (just the middle of his torso, no head etc) undoing his belt on his trousers.
Would that be THIS (http://img.tesco.com/pi/Books/L/98/9780141441498.jpg) cover then?

I have the Penguin version, a naked female torso covered with leaves.
And I think yours looks like THIS (http://img.tesco.com/pi/Books/L/95/9780140274295.jpg).

It's quite interesting looking at all the different covers and trying to work out the target audience of each of the publishers from it...

From what I can gather, there were actually three different versions of the novel published at various times and it's said that the 2nd version is the most explicit. I'm now wondering which version I have!

[Kell]

I know this is a double post, but it's back to discussion of the book, rather than the cover, so I wanted to separate them.

This time a couple of observations/questions regarding Chapter 4:
When the four men are talking, it is mentioned that talking intellectually to a woman should be no different to sleeping with her.

They “perform” better with Constance in the room (albeit silently). Are they then, by their own intellectual standards, making love to her in Clifford's stead? Is he, in a way, being complicit, even at this early stage, in her being with other men?

Conversely, this seems to be contradicted within the same chapter: Marriage is spoken of in terms of labels of ownership between spouses, with them each becoming an extension of the other.

As Clifford is, due to his disability, sexless, is Constance then sexless by extension? Is this why, Tommy Dukes can say "sh*t" in front of Constance, despite claiming to be unable to do so in front of a woman? Is she considered, in this way, an “un-woman”?

I just wondered what impressions/thoughts, if any, anyone else had on this subject...

[Echo]

It also struck me when Dukes was able to curse in front of Connie, when he has just stated that he wasn't able to. I also noticed that when she speaks up, they look at her with resentment, as if she wasn't supposed to make her presence known at all.

One thing that she describes is how unused her body, her womb are, as if she has no use to Clifford or to anyone else as a woman, just as a presence. You can tell that Clifford feels this way when he so adamantly wants her to stay with him, but doesn't care if she has an affair. She's not a woman to him, she's just his wife.

[wrathofkublakhan]

Here's the cover of mine - I think it's great there are so many different versions!

http://www.calarts.edu/%7Edk/tut/lady_chats.jpg

[LittleLijah]

Picked a copy up from the library last night and the cover is different to all the ones mentioned. It's a naked lady on a bed but half sat, half lying and her limbs are strategically positioned. Quite a racy cover for a library version!

[Maureen]

My cover shows a lady in a pink slip with her hands cupped under her belly and a man pressing against her back, with his nose in her hair and his hands around her wrists.

[wrathofkublakhan]

I've read the first four chapters now and I have to say Mr. DH is very "wordy", the discussions by the men almost feel like satire though I think our author is gently mocking the culture as much as allowing the characters to make a point.
New to me euphemisms are just great, I chuckled at the choice of "crisis", for example. Now I giggle at news flashes on the television, "Crisis in Hollywood!"

Ever since George said, "I have to go the euphemism" in Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? - I've cherished each and every example I come across in literature.

[Kell]

Wrath - I've been doing exactly the same thing over "crisis"! :lol: He does seem to persist in that phrase. I'm enjoying his descriptiveness though - it's quite poetic and flowing.

[Echo]

Yes, that word "crisis" is a little strange! But I agree that the author's style is very easy to read and flows nicely. However, I've also found that he repeats himself quite a bit, especially in a descriptive paragraph. Has anyone else noticed this?

[Kell]

However, I've also found that he repeats himself quite a bit, especially in a descriptive paragraph. Has anyone else noticed this?
I noticed that - it seems to be most often when someone's having a bit of an inner dialogue - almost like the character is talking to themselves. It feels like they're reassuring themselves that something is so. Surprisingly, I quite like this tactic on this occasion - usually it would drive me round the twist!

[Echo]

I noticed that - it seems to be most often when someone's having a bit of an inner dialogue - almost like the character is talking to themselves. It feels like they're reassuring themselves that something is so. Surprisingly, I quite like this tactic on this occasion - usually it would drive me round the twist!

I'm not sure about driving me round the twist, but it sure is distracting! For the most part, though, I have found Lawrence's descriptions of the Midlands to be beautiful, even though he's describing a pretty bleak landscape. He captures the mood beautifully, and I love how he ties it in with Connie's feelings.

[wrathofkublakhan]

I noticed that - it seems to be most often when someone's having a bit of an inner dialogue - almost like the character is talking to themselves. It feels like they're reassuring themselves that something is so. Surprisingly, I quite like this tactic on this occasion - usually it would drive me round the twist!

That's an interesting observation - I'll tune my reader's eye to see if I notice that as well.

The things that make me pause while reading are the broad assumptions, almost saying "and that is how women are" or "that is what men think". I'll blink and wonder, wow - that's a big leap from whatever was the prior line.

If you follow Uncle Wrath's postings, you'd know I jump on tangents quite a bit -- I'd prefer to think it's the product of a keen mind rather than distracted by "ohhhh, bright, shiny!"

My current tangents from reading this book is that I am beginning to wonder about the discussions of the men while Connie is in the room - that it takes a certain feeling of privilege to candidly discuss intimate details with such cardboard candor and to not treasure things that are commonly weighty; like sex with another partner.

The other tangent that I might explore is the brief discussion about things industrial because I think the period that the book is written in the world is still reeling from the impact of factories to the extent that there were art movements based just on that. So, the context which some of these statements and assumptions may need to be understood in the time of writing. I dunno, I'll look into it - stuff like that makes the book just a little more enjoyable.

[Maureen]

To tell you the truth, at times while reading this book, I felt as if it was jointly written with a female. It is really strange IMO, to find something written during that period, by a male, but which is as sensitive to a woman's point of view, needs and thoughts.
"Crisis" bewildered me at first - I had to read the sentence 2ce to understand what he was saying! :lol:

[Kell]

If you follow Uncle Wrath's postings, you'd know I jump on tangents quite a bit -- I'd prefer to think it's the product of a keen mind rather than distracted by "ohhhh, bright, shiny!"
It's funny that Lawrence seems to think that women are more able to focus on things for longer periods of ti... oh, look at the butterfly!

Ahem! Yes, about the ability to focus - I must have a particularly male mind in that respect! Also, although I'm only up to chapter 10 (so not too much of Mellors as yet - we're still just beginning to get to know him), Mellors seems to have that ability to focus in the same way, and on the same level as, Constance, whereas her husband seems more flighty and prone to mentally wander off onto another subject at the drop of a hat.

To tell you the truth, at times while reading this book, I felt as if it was jointly written with a female.
I think you're right - Lawrence's style seems peculiarly feminine - if this were a newly published book by an author whose name I'd never heard, I would assume that D. H. stood for something like Diane Helen, or Doreen Heather - I definitely would have attributed it to a female writer.

[Maureen]

I was wondering, whether British people would perhaps get more out of this book - especially people who are a bit older. (The era and descriptions.) I enjoyed reading the historical bits, but they did not come alive for me. (Don't know if I explained that ok)

[Echo]

Maureen,

I think I know what you mean. But remember, there are common histories around the world. When I read the descriptions of the Midlands, I think of the industrial east coast of America and the coal mines out there. I also think of the many thousands of American WWI veterans...I can tie my own history to the history presented in the book.

[wrathofkublakhan]

After just finishing The Kite Runner (http://www.bookclubforum.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=3026&highlight=kite+runner) and now about half-way through LCL; it strikes me how authors who've main characters who are writers, really paint these characters in an unflattering light.
I wonder what is going on in their heads because I might think that a writer character would be a projection, of sorts, of the author.
Look at Mr. DH, belittling poor Clifford for writing and detailing about characters and their relationships ~ which really is exactly what Mr. DH is doing even as I read the book.

(pardon the spoiler, its just ramblings)



Even though I am only half-way through ~ what I find brilliant is the emphasis on "nothing", beginning with Clifford's writing and then extending it to how Connie is feeling and really, everyone is feeling. Because one might hope for depth in a human being but really once you get past the superficial activities on the ... uh... surface, underneath is a nothing. Then extending that "nothing" even more by the numb, passionless sex between the two; she is completely inactive and just lays there and he doesn't even connect with her beyond the physical.
This, I think, is brilliant.
Over and over again, Mr. DH writes of situations where people are inter-acting but each come away with their own, very different, versions of what just happened and mostly a self-centered reaction. I'm not sure, but it seems that he is making the point with everyone of all levels in their society.
That last thing which I'll point out as bizarre is that Connie instantly seems to know when she's pregnant and it's as if she can will it to live or not. That very day she seems to have "passion in her veins." Yeah, that struck me as either naive or simply odd.

[Lilywhite]

So far I'm only up to ch7 in this one, it's taking me ages to read and at times is feeling a bit of a chore. This doesn't mean I'm not enjoying it though, because I am, it's just some paragraphs I feel are a bit lengthy for the poing he's trying to get across.

However, I do agree with the point about it feeling very feminine. If I had ne previous author knowledge I would assume it was a woman. I get a feeling that although Constance does all the things women were supposed to do (such as sitting in the room but not talking) there is an underlying mockery of the whole setup, as if DHL thought such practices funny.

[Maureen]

I've finished the book. These are some of my thoughts.

I was rather surprised by Michaelis view to sex for women. After they had had sex, he asked Connie "I suppose you'll hate me now" - because that is what women are supposed to feel. I was further surprised later on when he admitted that he did not much care whether she was sexually satisified or not.
At the time, i can understand that sex was a taboo subject, and most people had a very unhealthy view about it, so that is certainly why this book caused such a stir. Had it been written today, no one would have commented twice about it.
At times it was too flowery and descriptive for me - that's not saying i did not enjoy the book, although I am not looking forwards to reading more of the same type.

At first I thought it strange for Clifford to propose to his wife that she should have a child with someone else. However he must have seen that as a way to save his marriage - he was feeling that Connie is not living in a bed of roses.

[wrathofkublakhan]

I just finished the book with a mad 75 page dash to the end, simply could not / would not put it down. I had to know how it'd turn out.

What a splendid read! To the very end I could not be sure how it would end or what shape the end of the story might take.

Some of the predictions in my beginning posts came true, some did not - it was a very good reading experience.

I'm sure many of us will have critiques and comments on the story and I'll be ready to chime in as people finish up their own journey.

[Kell]

Well, I thought I'd have a bash at answering those questions:

1- Who was your favourite character and why?
I think Mellors was my favourite character - I loved his quiet self-assuredness, and the fact that he could be tender and yet still not feel he was dismissing his own masculinity. He wasn't in the least pretentious, although he was good at fitting himself to the situation as he saw it (shown by his changing accent) and would stand up for what he believed in.

2- Was there a particular part you enjoyed/disliked more than the rest?
I loved the scenes between Mellors and Constance - I especially liked how the "love-talk" was handled - Mellors even managed to make the unmentionable "c-word" sound gentle and not at all derogatory. I also enjoyed the lightness of tone throughout the novel.

3- Was this the first book you've read in this genre/ by this author, has it encouraged you to read more?
It's the first I've read by D H Lawrence, and I will certainly read more of his work. I've read other books set during a similar period, but in different areas and slightly different social sets (for example, The Great Gatsby focuses more on the American party set; A Taste of Blood Wine is 99% set in England and, again, features more of a social scene; P G Wodehouse's Jeeves and Wooster stories are also very social, with lots of visiting other people and places). This felt more stationary and confined, which, I think, added to the feeling that Constance was trapped in a place and marriage that did not make her happy.

4- Were there any parts/ideas you struggled with?
No - it all flowed very smoothly for me and I had no trouble at all. The language was gorgeous, the descriptive passages were delightful and the characters were well-drawn - what's not to like?!

5- Overall, was reading the book an enjoyable experience?
I expected it to be a lot more steamy than it actually was - it turned out to be quite demure by comparison to some other "erotic" novels (such as Fanny Hill by John Cleland). Overall, I enjoyed every moment. I spent a lot longer reading this book than I usually do (mostly because I was so exhausted from jury duty all last week), but I savoured every last second of it. It was rather a refreshing read!

[Maureen]

I'll try to answer the questions too:

1- Who was your favourite character and why?
I think I liked Cliffords nurse best. She was a very strong person, had a tough life, yet knew how to make the best out of things, and although she could have potentially harmed Connie, she helped both Chatterlys a lot instead.


2- Was there a particular part you enjoyed/disliked more than the rest?
I hated the part when Connie was almost giving up on life and youth, and got ready to wither away. i also hated the part when she let Michaelis use her, and she did not do the same.

3- Was this the first book you've read in this genre/ by this author, has it encouraged you to read more?
It's the first I've read by D H Lawrence yes. I also steer clear of these type of books usually - the language and style used in this era is not my style at all.

4- Were there any parts/ideas you struggled with?
No , not particulary.


5- Overall, was reading the book an enjoyable experience?
I expected it to be a loads more steamy and more erotic - perhaps because it had such an impact when it was published. I also realised how, in a relatively short span of time, a lot of sexual taboos have been abolished, to the extent that we have now become almost unshockable.

[Kell]

Did anyone else find the end very sudden and abrupt? I found I wanted just a few more pages to round things off a bit...

[Maureen]

Yes, i noticed that too - perhaps a bit more about both parties would have made a better ending.

[wrathofkublakhan]

I'll try to answer the questions too:

1- Who was your favourite character and why?
I liked Clifford's nurse, Mrs. Bolton the best. She was very wise and saw beyond her own selfish nose - can't say the same for any of the other characters. I also liked the shift later in the book when she became sort of the Mother Of Us All, a nice little literary step into an archetype; representing something greater than just herself.


2- Was there a particular part you enjoyed/disliked more than the rest?
I liked the trip to Venice. It allowed us to see Connie outside of her situation so we could look at her in a new light. Sadly, she didn't really re-new herself - nonetheless the opportunity was there.

3- Was this the first book you've read in this genre/ by this author, has it encouraged you to read more?
It's my first by this author.
I think he had one more book that was more popular (Son's and Lovers?) that I might try. I always thought he was cool in that he had a ranch (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._H._Lawrence_Ranch) (really a retreat) in New Mexico that was visited by Gertrude Stein and some of the other writers of that time.

4- Were there any parts/ideas you struggled with?
Not really, I was very interested in the impact of Industry and Technology in that time and how obsessed not just Clifford but Mr. DH was with just that.


5- Overall, was reading the book an enjoyable experience?
It sure was enjoyable.
There were times when I grew impatient with the characters or impatient with the pace/descriptions. I believe that it is an "important" piece of work so I am also proud to have read it and can say that I have.
Others have said they were not shocked - I was shocked to the core to read the C-word! I had to stop and pick my teeth up off the ground and re-check exactly when this book was first published!

6 - What this a good Reading Circle choice?
I think that it was - the shared experience of reading this novel made it all the more fun.
I felt that there has been and continues to be an interesting conversation about the book and the reading experience of a classic.
It was not a light-weight read like a children's book - it took some time and effort, it has a context of history yet still proves as sound bit of writing in today's standard. In my opinion, very successful.

[Kell]

Others have said they were not shocked - I was shocked to the core to read the C-word! I had to stop and pick my teeth up off the ground and re-check exactly when this book was first published!
I was sort of shocked a little, but the context was an odd one - Mellors seemed to use it in such an endearing way, rather than as a derogatory term, that it almost seemed sweet. (I'm not sure I've explained that quite as well as I wanted to, but you might get the general idea.) I've never before seen or heard that word used affectionately like that, and it sort of took the edge off the harshness of the word, and the shock out of the connotations, for me.

[Lilywhite]

I finally managed to finish this book and I'm still a bit lost as to what I think of it. The most part was a very enjoyable read, but I was quite bored during some of the lesser active chapters and I didn't feel it moved fast enough for my liking. I did feel for the characters though, each in their own individual circumstances.

1- Who was your favourite character and why?
I did like Mellors, even though some of the time I didn't quite understand where he was coming from. He was a loveable rogue and he made me laugh quite a bit.
2- Was there a particular part you enjoyed/disliked more than the rest?
I found the mens discussions in the early part of the book very boring and I was sorely tempted just to bypass them but on the other hand I enjoyed Connie's personal thoughts whilst out a wandering on her own.
3- Was this the first book you've read in this genre/ by this author, has it encouraged you to read more?
This was my first DH Lawrence book but not my first classic. I may look for further reading along the same lines in the future.
4- Were there any parts/ideas you struggled with?
My only real problem was Connie and Mellor's first 'encounter' with each other, it just came out of the blue and there seemed to be no real reason behind it. There was no tension between them or any build up that I noticed.
5- Overall, was reading the book an enjoyable experience?
Overall, I did enjoy this book, even though I wouldn't say it was a fantastic read.

[Maureen]

I was sort of shocked a little, .

Wrath - I was shocked to the core to read the C-word! I had to stop and pick my teeth up off the ground and re-check exactly when this book was first published!

to tell you the truth, it felt a bit "on purpose" to me - as if the author wanted to see how far he could go....No one uses that word the way it was used in the book (as far as i know!). To me it felt a bit contrived.

[Kylie]

However, I've also found that he repeats himself quite a bit, especially in a descriptive paragraph. Has anyone else noticed this?

I started reading this book recently and have had a bit of trouble getting into it (may be due in part to tiredness so I've been reading only a little at a time before I get sleepy).

I've also found it repetitive in parts and some of the lengthy dialogue and rambling thoughts have bored me a little, but I'm persevering and starting to enjoy it more (Connie has started wandering in the woods and has found the hut).

[Kylie]

I noticed that - it seems to be most often when someone's having a bit of an inner dialogue - almost like the character is talking to themselves. It feels like they're reassuring themselves that something is so. Surprisingly, I quite like this tactic on this occasion - usually it would drive me round the twist!

I didn't mind the repetitiveness on these occasions for the exact reason that you mention, Kell.

I didn't particularly enjoy this book overall. I've put a more lengthy review on my reading blog, but my points there are mostly summarised in the questions below.

1. Who was your favourite character and why?
Mellors. He was the only one I could begin to comprehend. He was basically a decent, simple guy (and too good for the likes of Connie!).

2. Was there a particular part you enjoyed/disliked more than the rest?
I disliked all the rambling dialogue and thoughts of the pompous 'intellectuals'. The scenes with Connie and Mellors were OK (that would be all their scenes, not just the raunchy ones!) :p

3. Was this the first book you've read in this genre/by this author, has it encouraged you to read more?
First book by DH Lawrence. I have Sons and Lovers on my TBR pile and I'm hoping I enjoy it more than Lady Chatterley's Lover!

4. Were there any parts/ideas you struggled with?
See the first sentence of Q2 :p It wasn't the ideas I struggled with, just the long-winded way in which they were written.

5. Overall, was reading the book an enjoyable experience?
Not particularly! But I'm glad I read it anyway because it's an important book in the history of literature, and now I understand why a bit better.

6. Was this a good Reading Circle choice?
Yes, I think so. It's interesting to see how almost everyone else loved this book and I didn't :mrgreen:

[Kylie]

Forgot to mention when I posted my review that a new French adaptation of this movie has recently been released (or maybe it's been out for a long time in the UK), which is timely considering it was our reading circle choice. A trailer can be seen here (http://www.apple.com/trailers/independent/ladychatterley/). I don't know that the characters look much like I imagined, especially Mellors.

[Maureen]

I think they suit what I had pictured. Constance would be slightly fleshier, but apart from that, they did not disappoint me.

[Kell]

Forgot to mention when I posted my review that a new French adaptation of this movie has recently been released (or maybe it's been out for a long time in the UK), which is timely considering it was our reading circle choice.
I'm going to be getting hold of a copy of this as soon as possible (I actually saw the trailer a while ago and completely forgot about it!). I did watch the British mini-series immediately after reading the book for Reading Circle and although I enjoyed it and thought the performances very good, I couldn't help thinking the leading lady had been miscast on looks alone - she was blond and skinny for a start, whereas in the book, if I remember correctly, she is described as having brown hair and a very feminine figure... Let's see what this French film version brings...