View Full Version : P G Wodehouse
sib
28th April 2006, 20:16
Hi, is anyone into P G Wodehouse?
Angel
28th April 2006, 20:25
I must confess that I haven't read any of his books
Welcome to the forum. I'm sure that you'll enjoy it here! We're a chatty bunch so just feel free to join in!
Kell
28th April 2006, 20:38
Is it him that did all the Jeeves & Wooster stuff? I've not read them but I caught the occasional Fry & Laurie series on telly...
Angel
28th April 2006, 20:50
Kell it was - I checked on Amazon :wink:
Inanna
28th April 2006, 21:17
I don't believe I have read any of his books before, no!
But welcome aboard :wink:
Maureen
29th April 2006, 07:22
Not even me. What type of books does he have?
wiccibat
30th April 2006, 11:42
My old man loves his books, I've read a couple and they are really funny.The T.V. series captures the essence of the books very well.
Freewheeling Andy
1st May 2006, 10:48
The books are fantastic. The TV series caught the mood very well, but you acn't quite get Wodehouse's writing style onto the screen. I've only read 3 or 4 of them but they're such good fun.
Sarahrob
2nd May 2006, 09:23
I've only ever read What Ho, Jeeves, but thought it was completely fantastic and would love to read more.
Philip Stein
9th June 2006, 09:48
Yes Wodehouse is a master. The difficulty is that he wrote about 90 books so it's hard to know where to start. I've read maybe a dozen or so. I strongly recommend Leave it to Psmith as one of his best novels. The story collections Meet Mr Mulliner and Ukridge are wonderful too. He has a particular way of phrasing things which is slightly old-fashioned and yet perfectly hilarious. And that's without even mentioning the Blandings books or the Jeeves and Wooster ones (which I don't like quite as much). The plots of his books are almost interchangeable - bossy aunts, drippy blokes, feisty girls, stolen manuscripts, prize-winning pigs - but it's all in the writing.
sib
10th September 2006, 21:35
He's probably my favourite author, but I agree that his plots and characters are a bit the same sometimes. :reading:
Louiseog
11th September 2006, 17:08
I love his books, so easy to read! Quite samey but that is part of the attraiction, Simon Brett has something the same about his books as does MC Beaton and Agatha Raisin. I think
Adore the television too
sib
11th September 2006, 20:58
I know what you mean about the saminess being a good thing - it's like the characters are old friends. I think his books give you a nice, warm feeling. His use of language is masterly - the way he expresses things is funny. And some of his comedy situations are pure genius - I think Something Fresh, chapter 8, part IV is a great example. :lol:
I think Stephen Fry and Hugh Laurie were brilliant in the TV Jeeves and Wooster. I picture them as Bertie and Jeeves when I read the books now, as well as some of the other actors in that series as their respective characters in the books.
His stories are farces about young men and women trying to make a buck and marry the girl/man of their dreams. Then of course there's Jeeves and Wooster; Wooster being the aristocratic Tim Nice But Dim character and Jeeves (his manservant) always getting him out of the various scrapes he gets into. And not to forget Ukridge, the likeable ne'er do well always with a grand scheme up his sleeve but never more than about threepence in his pocket. And Psmith, not one of my favourite characters, but a crafty and resilient chap all the same.
Some of his comic situations are brilliant, and his use of language to great comic effect and his ability to find the telling phrase are masterly.
A good one to start with would probably be Very Good Jeeves, a book of short stories with Jeeves and Wooster.
Liz
6th October 2006, 19:01
I've got two of the Jeeves books - Very Good, Jeeves and Right Ho, Jeeves. I know that there are a few more before those two in the series, but are they the type of books where it's better to read them in order, or doesn't it make much difference?
sib
6th October 2006, 20:02
I've got two of the Jeeves books - Very Good, Jeeves and Right Ho, Jeeves. I know that there are a few more before those two in the series, but are they the type of books where it's better to read them in order, or doesn't it make much difference?
To be honest, you could probably read them in any order. Even if you haven't read the previous books Wodehouse will fill you in on any essential details from those stories. He makes a kind of joke of it; Wooster says 'Please stop me if I've told you this before, but for those who haven't read of my previous adventures...' etc.
Both Very Good, Jeeves and Right Ho, Jeeves are really good ones.
Liz
7th October 2006, 13:27
Ah, that's good then. Thanks very much, Sib.
sib
7th October 2006, 17:13
Let us know what you think of them.
poppy
8th October 2006, 00:22
Wodehouse is my favourite humorous author. I saw some-one describe his books as satire, which I suppose in a way they are. I've read every book of his I can lay my hands on and many several times. They are real feel-good books and so very funny. Jeeves and Wooster are my favs, and like you say sib, Hugh Laurie and Stephen Fry play their parts to perfection. But the Blandings series is excellent as well, I have a lot of affection for Lord Emsworth and his pig. I love the names the gives his characters - Gussie Fink-Nottle, Biffy, Barmy, Stiffy, Pongo etc etc.
Now I'm going to use one of his quotes as my signature:mrgreen:
sib
9th October 2006, 19:43
I think blandings is probably his most consistently good setting. (Not sure if that was a very good sentence, but nevermind.) But some of his one-off novels are great too. Try 'The Small Bachelor' and 'Uneasy Money' (this was the first one I read, and I'm re-reading it now).
He's just got a way of saying things which is funny; your signature quote is a good example.
Not sure I'd describe his books as satires particularly, (I always think of more scathing critiques of society or something when I think of satires). I'd just describe his books as 'fun'.
Anyway, happy Wodehousing.
poppy
9th October 2006, 22:33
It's quite difficult to get hold of his more obscure (if that's the right word) books in NZ. I've read everything available in the library and always look out for his books in second-hand shops, but haven't come across these two, as far as I remember.
sib
11th October 2006, 20:40
It's quite difficult to get hold of his more obscure (if that's the right word) books in NZ. I've read everything available in the library and always look out for his books in second-hand shops, but haven't come across these two, as far as I remember.
You'll get The Small Bachelor from Amazon. In fact, I think Amazon is quite a good place for Wodehouse.
Alot of his books are like gold-dust, now. The rarer ones seem to go for silly money on ebay. I think Everyman are doing a new series of his books, and have already got quite a few in print.
Pilgrim
20th October 2006, 15:09
If anyone's interested, we're discussing Jeeves and Wooster stories at this site:
http://discussions.pbs.org/viewforum.pbs?f=4
KAY
31st October 2006, 20:43
I had seen a jeeves and wooster episode on tv and thought i'd like to get into reading them, so i bought "thankyou jeeves" only the time i read it was when i was feeling sick and in a great deal of pain with mumps and now everytime i see them on the shelves in the book shops it reminds me of my horrid mumps, the pain the sick and supplies me with dire memories. will one day erase the memories and read more though.
Pilgrim
19th November 2006, 01:23
Funny to think that Wooster has become famous as House, MD. I like Hugh Laurie and Stephen Fry in Jeeves and Wooster.
This is a wonderful clip from the Emmy Awards with him and Helen Mirren.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Sv7Hy91EgM
Ophelia
8th December 2006, 17:52
I've read quite a few and have loved them. A couple of years ago a (fairly wealthy) friend bought me a Folio Society copy of 'The Plums of P G Wodehouse' which contains some of his best bits. I'm not sure whether it's published by anyone else, though.
Purple Poppy
10th December 2006, 00:47
Having read this thread through, I realise that I have been missing alot...and now intend to put that right. I did read some Jeeves and Wooster when I was in my teens and I know I enjoyed it, but I can't remember what it was. And yes, the TV version was great. Thanks for the recommendations. I will try and get started sometime in the new year.
Thanks for the link Pilgrim. Very funny :lol:
Liz
10th December 2006, 05:03
:lol: :lol: That's a great clip. Thanks Pilgrim.
Pilgrim
10th December 2006, 20:30
You're welcome.
He's a very funny man and Helen Mirren is so classy.
Liz
11th December 2006, 02:04
I like Hugh Laurie when he's with Stephen Fry in A Bit of Fry & Laurie. I think they work really well together.
Snowflake
18th December 2006, 10:21
Just got the whole set of DVDs of Jeeves and Wooster with Hugh Laurie and Stephen Fry -yay!!
Liz
18th December 2006, 10:40
I've asked for that set for Christmas. Hopefully I may get it.
If not I'll just buy it from Amazon with some Christmas money I know I'm getting.
Danna
6th June 2007, 00:56
If you enjoy Wodehouse's Jeeves and Wooster... you might want to try E. F. Benson's Mapp and Lucia series.
Danna
Kylie
7th August 2008, 02:21
I think it's high time we revive this thread on PG Wodehouse!
I've almost finished reading Thank You, Jeeves, my first Wodehouse, and I think it's brilliant. I'm already looking forward to getting my hands on more of his novels.
Arrow Books (http://www.wodehouse.co.uk/) in the UK is re-releasing his books, which is great timing for new collectors such as myself. Personally, I quite like the new covers, but when I showed a woman at work yesterday, she said she would never pick up a book with that cover if she was browsing books. What do you all think of these covers (http://www.wodehouse.co.uk/titles.php?rnd=eaKBqO3Z%2FbrkpCb3FbRIdrJmXpvfjzRQt PbROlzWa55%2Fr%2FtSEMC8g3TTaHTa1j3M)?
poppy
7th August 2008, 02:41
I think they are probably a lot better than some of the older ones. They convey humour and the time period well. Most people know who P.G.Wodehouse was (well you'd think so anyway) so they would be buying them for the book, not the cover.
Kylie
7th August 2008, 04:03
Yes, you would think so, but unfortunately, of the (perhaps) 3 people I've shown this book too, 2 of them have looked at me and the book blankly.
Kell
7th August 2008, 05:38
I rather like the look of the covers - they definitely suit the stories!
Janet
7th August 2008, 07:28
I think they're great too. :) A whole set of those on the bookshelf would look really smart, I think!
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.