Jump to content

Anna Karenina - Leo Tolstoy


Katya

Recommended Posts

For the third time (actually, the first time in two years) I am reading this great novel, moreso because I adore the story of Levin and Kitty. Not usually am I irked by a novel's protagonist, but this is the case with me. I find Anna fickle and exasperating, however outwardly dazzling. And Vronsky seems to represent all those shallow high school boys my friends once swooned over. Nevertheless, I am having a good time reading this book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not so sure I agree with you re Anna and Vronsky, yes, Vronsky is, as Nabokov pointed out "a blunt fellow with a mediocre mind", but Anna is something completely different. I think Anna Karenina is, in many ways, Tolstoi battling against himself-and the artist in him coming out the stronger. Anna started out as a tepid, rather banal character, but she sprung into life as one of the most beautiful female characters in all literature-she towers above the zero-dimensional characters of Gogol's stories and the one-dimensional Turgenev maidens, Anna soars above all these trite conventions of Russian literature, Anna is the case of Tolstoi's imagination overcoming his own sexist views. Again, Tolstoi tried to emphasise the spiritual affinity between Kitty and Levin versus the sensual and sexual connection between Anna and Vronsky, but their scenes are some of the most poignant and realistic love scenes in all of literature-the passage when Vr. first meets Anna is one of the most beautiful in the book, as well as the scene in the ballroom, the deterioration of their relationship is beautifully done, yes there is a strongly physical aspect to their relationship, but their relationship is also one of the most beautiful love stories ever told, and this is again Tolstoi the storyteller triumphing over Tolstoi the moralist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like your understanding of the characters, very interesting, though I don't know if I would agree or not, because I had read it once many years ago with a different understanding of life and prose.

 

I remember thinking that had Anna Karenina lived in a different time and place, with different choices, she could have reached something wonderful and would have been remembered for greatness instead of living the tragedy that her life became. Then I woke up completely from the book and realised it's just a character from a book and not of real life. :readingtwo:

 

I've forgotten most of the characters now, but I still also remember

being shocked and disappointed in her when she actually considered leaving her son, leaving her husband I could understand, but not leaving her child. But then later her husband, showed positive behaviour towards her despite of knowing everything, which also surprised me as I didn't expect that reaction from him

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find Anna quite a mystery still. Sometimes I think I get why she chooses how she does, and sometimes I'm sure I don't get her at all. But she seems very real to me. But I see what you mean about Anna and Wronsky. The first time I read the book I thought that Anna and Wronsky was the relationship you thought you'd want, but it could never last. And Kitty and Levin was the one that seemed a bit boring, but had a depth that you needed to get close to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
For the third time (actually, the first time in two years) I am reading this great novel, moreso because I adore the story of Levin and Kitty. Not usually am I irked by a novel's protagonist, but this is the case with me. I find Anna fickle and exasperating, however outwardly dazzling. And Vronsky seems to represent all those shallow high school boys my friends once swooned over. Nevertheless, I am having a good time reading this book.

 

I loved this book! Levin and Kitty were my favorites too. I thought about reading that again this summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a nice read. :friends0:

 

I'm not rereading this book yet. So far, I've only read it once, a few years ago. I liked it, but not enough to make me want to reread it. Perhaps in a few years I will feel like doing that. I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I finished Anna Karenina on Thursday.

 

Splendid.

 

The subtle foreshadowing of Anna's tragic fate in dreams and symbols (the shuddering train and the Russian peasant's mumbled words) prepares the way for a spine-tingling climax that I rate as one of the most incredible experiences I have had reading.

Edited by Ben Mines
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I think it is one of the great books. The fact that Anna is such a difficult to place character makes her all the more real. She represents what humans are like. At first she seems in full control of a situation that soon takes her over and then she is swept away by events beyond her control. Isn't this how much of our lives run their course? We often think we control our fates and then fate bites us in the hind quarters.

 

This is one of those books that shows a human struggle with so much force of recognition that it will stay with you for a long time. One of the best books I ever read!

 

Henk (tdaonp).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

That must be a record or something! :D

 

Yeah, double WOW! My copy of AK is extremely thick (don't know how many pages), and the print is tiny. It took me a fair old time to read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read this in a matter of hours a couple of weeks ago. I quite literally could not put it down. I had to add a TBR Again section to my book journal just for this novel. Entirely captivating, beautifully written. In a word, stunning.

 

Wow! You're a fast reader. I read it many years ago and I honestly don't remember the story that well. I'll have to read it again so I can better appreciate it.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am indeed a very fast reader. I don't seem to have been much gifted. My singing is atrocious, numbers make no sense to me whatsoever, and any form of science completely escapes me. Literature however is my home as it were!

 

At the risk of being beaten around the head with the hardback edition of War and Peace by fellow lovers of Classics, I will admit that "a matter of hours" can be summed up as 2 and a half.

 

These days I prefer to read a few pages, digest them and then return to the book later on. Anna Karenina though made this entirely impossible. With every page I read, I had to know what was on the next! Quite possibly because I think I fell in love with Levin :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geez, I never did a pages/hour ratio before, it's actually pretty frightening. Bel-ami, you may have just proven what I should have known all along...that I need to get a life!

 

A few years ago, when we did "silent reading" at school, I used to get told off for skimming, which I always vehemently denied, as although I just roll my eyes across the lines on a page, I do actually take every single word in.

 

On top of this, I get completely lost in books, and if someone wants to say something to me, they have to physically shake the book I'm reading to bring me back to reality! I'm virtually indistractable (did I just make a word up???)

 

I imagine if they made AK into an exact film, it would take about 2.5 hours. That's kind of what happens when I read: it plays out as a movie would in my head, and the narrative I actually visualise very quickly.

 

*Weirdo am I.* :lol:.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...