Whilst I am certainly a Dawkins advocate, I can also agree with your points. He is vehemently against religion, although connotations of religion = evil are not what he intends; he is more religion = misguided folly; and perhaps more like Carl Sagan in The Demon Haunted World.
However, you are right insofar as Dawkins' highlighting WHY there is no god, etc, is rather a nostrum and does not solve the problem, as people need religion for a reason; and simply removing the 'crutch' for people will do more harm than good. Perhaps Dawkins should introduce some Buddhist elements as well, to help people understand they have one life, and to make it count, etc.
I think more important, and Dawkins does at least sideswipe this, is to get people to consider their beliefs and not merely close the door on them as right and true.
Can I just say that this is a great forum as we can have this discussion without somebody resorting to insult?