Jump to content

Paul

Member
  • Posts

    323
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Paul

  1. Just sticking my nose in after a long time to say that it is a pleasure to hear a semblance of the native language that my mother spoke long ago.

    I'm now sorry I never responded well to her determined efforts to teach it to me.  It sounded so funny to my 6r old American ears that I refused to repeat anything in Finnish after her.  Now I am trying to self-learn it from the printed page (no audio available).

    But I think I can still say correctly (and bravely), even if I can't spell it very correctly:

     

    Ona liista yta vuataa!

     

    Happy New Year to everyone here.

     

    Paul

  2. Ker-runch!!  What a good question and what great lists of authors!  But at the moment I am caught entirely off guard, standing completely on the wrong foot, without a single author who comes to mind.  :o I am just plain authored out.

    I would just be happy to conquer the twin peaks of TBR books on my end-table, even though I haven't the faintest ideas of who their authors are.

    But when I scrunch my brain, some almost forgotten pending names do fall out:

     

    Jules Romains

    John Dos Passos

    H. Rider Haggard

    Louis Lamour

    Larry McMurtry

    Taylor Caldwell

    Graham Greene

    Nathaniel Hawthorne

    Peter Matthiessen

    Marilynne Robinson

    Anita Shreve

     

    That's ten anyway, actually eleven; but those TBR's are still staring at me. :(

  3.  

    • How different genders/races/sexualities influence and/or are represented in your own reading?

     

    I look forward to hearing people's thoughts!

     

     

    . Some genres are marketed for male or females and have more female or male authors. There's no reason why women couldn't write SFF or why men couldn't write a romantic book, or why women couldn't enjoy SFF and why men couldn't enjoy a romantic book. It's all based on stupid stereotypes :banghead:.

     

     

     

    I hope this isn't off-topic, since you ask about gender specifically.

    But, I like to think it is quality of story-telling and style of writing that attract me to books, and that these important considerations somehow get lost in these discussions.

    I like Virginia Woolf, George Eliot, Marguerite Duras, William Faulkner, James Salter, John Banville. and J.D. Salinger.

    On the other hand, Celia Ahern and Paulo Coelho both drive me up the absolute wall and make me gag.

    In science fiction, I have liked Day of the Triffids, Ender's Game and Canticle for Leibowitz.

    Among authors unknown to me, I gladly pick up books by women writers, e.g. Stella Rimington and Clarice Lispector.

    If men are indeed ignoring high quality books by women, then that is truly a sad day and I share your unhappiness.

    Paul

  4. I'm glad you enjoyed both books :). I shall have to re-read To Kill a Mockingbird some day, then think about if I want to read Go Set a Watchman or not.

     

    Yes, well, Athena,

    Watchman is a different kind of book.  If Mockingbird was the collision between Scout's youthful exuberance and the staid cultural standards of the town, then Watchman is more like the collision between Jean Louise's fully formed liberal outlook and the transitional racial culture of a town still coming to terms with, and resisting, racial integration.  Watchman is definitely a racial novel, and not just a picture of Atticus' racial views which attract most of the comment about the book.  As a moderate picture of the times it is not badly drawn.

    Your choice,

    Paul

  5. Have now finished reading both Mockingbird and Watchman end-to-end.

    In my opinions:

    1. Mockingbird is everything that all its admirers say it is.  Excellent, and congratulations to Harper Lee!

    2. Watchman is clearly a serious and complete literary work by an established author, even if somewhat uneven and on a less appealing theme. 

        It deserves to be in the author's public canon, and to suppress or trash it would have been a literary crime.

     

    As with any other books, one can make up one's own mind whether or not to read them.

    I am now glad I have read them both.

    Paul

  6. My to-read list is now reaching four-hundred books which is getting a bit ridiculous I think. It only started reaching extortionate levels when I started using Goodreads - it's just so easy to add books to your 'to-read shelf!' Plus I tend to expose myself to new books all the time; I read through a lot of book forums and always check out books on prize lists etc. I want to experience all the different writing styles there are and enter every persons mind to learn how they see the world - quite a big ask. I've now divided my to-read list into smaller categories to make it more manageable i.e. mental health books, medical books, fantasy books etc. 

     

    Another thing I've recently started doing is making a small list of five books I plan to read through within the next few weeks. This way I don't get distracted by the next new book on the bestseller lists. I have this awful habit of stopping a book half-way through, and I'm hoping that by breaking down my list into digestible chunks I can enjoy a book in its entirety instead of having my to-read lists looming behind me!

     

     

    Also, I just want to say this is incredible.

     

    Angury, Exactly my dream, too -- to have read one of each kind of book or author that is out there, just to know and enjoy what the field of literature has been. Meanwhile, I settle for a library that probably has a couple hundred years of reading in it, and simply ignore the fact that I'll never get around to all of it.  I just wish I had a list of the books I have actually read in my lifetime -- at about 50 a year when I am really going -- but even if I had that, it would not be very long.  It's all just too sobering. :(

     

    On the other hand, I think it is the joy of buying that is even greater than the joy of reading! :D  And that is accomplished once the book is in hand.  One doesn't even have to read it, just fondle it and put it on the shelf.

     

    So I'm content.

    A little bit crazy,

    But content :)

    Paul

  7. Aw, nicely said, Paul. I can't remember...have you read To Kill A Mockingbird? If so, did you enjoy it, and do you want to read Go Set a Watchman?

     

     

    Kylie,

    Thanks for your kind comment.

     

    No, I passed by Mockingbird when it came out -- not my favorite topic -- but comment on the story has been hard to miss.  (It feels like I have heard about race issues in the US every day of my life, ever since elementary school many years ago, and I am sort of full up to my earlobes on the topic by now.)

     

    However, it is on the shelf around here, and we have just picked up Watchman at B&N, so I'm going to be reading both, just to get re-informed and catch up with the crowd.

    Sorry to be grouchy, but I think some book hype/discussion gets really overdone (Witness 50 Shades).

     

    But have a nice day

    It looks hopeful here, early this morning

    Thanks

    Paul

  8. Is it our disappointment at Atticus coming down off a pedestal of our own creation? Or our disappointment at Harper Lee coming down off a pedestal? Or our suspicion of conspiracies?  Or our fear of contamination? Or what?

    Perhaps there are books that are so perfect they should be set off in isolation, and no other of an author's works read.  Or perhaps there are authors whose public persona is so perfect that their less public personalities should not be exposed to view.

    But I think almost anyone who reads much of an author realizes that their total oeuvre will be uneven and, for some, nothing is lost by seeing the person, and their works, and the times in which they were written, all as a whole.

    I would suggest, on the contrary that there is much to be gained.  But, to each their own for whatever our different purposes in reading.

    After all, we are all people, both the real ones and the fictional ones among us, and life is a wondrous thing in its variety.

    I am in the camp that reads everything, and still not enough time to do it.

  9. Life's Ways

     

    No one can construct for you the bridge upon which precisely you must cross the stream of life, no one but you yourself alone

    - Friedrich Nietzsche

    Now, at later age,

    I realize that I have lived my life incrementally, not knowing the future,

    with only general thoughts at each step of the way;

     

    As a child, with my parent's encouragement, and not knowing why,

    I only knew that doing well at school was a good thing,

    So I tried;

     

    Through college years I studied and worked hard,

    without clear ideas of what my chosen profession would be like; but I persisted,

    and became an electrical engineer;

     

    I sharpened my technical skills as well as I could along the way,

    and had my reward, by rising in my career

    further than I had expected.

     

    I enjoyed work and expected that I would work for my entire life;

    but then retirement age came, and I was retired,

    even though I would have preferred otherwise.

     

    But, professionally, things worked out

    better than I had been able to imagine.

    And my personal life too followed a path I could not have predicted

     

    As a child I did not know what marriage meant,

    except for the good examples seen in my own family and among my family's friends;

    I had no imagination of whether marriage would happen to me, or not.

     

    Later, in early teen years, I still did not understand

    how I would find love and what marriage would mean;

    yet, during college, I did find love and marry;

     

    Still, with no understanding of what parenting and family would mean,

    we had our first wonderful child;

    and then we had three more.

     

    Having seen unhappy marriages, I resolved

    that I would be happily married forever;

    but my marriage failed, and I felt the shame of divorce.

     

    For many years I had no interest in remarrying;

    once was enough for me for such heartache.

     

    I never thought I would find an attractive and lovely wife and partner again,

    yet it happened; and I have again found happiness,

    in a new life and in a wonderful second marriage.

     

    On balance, I would do it all again.

    So, the next ten years? Who knows?

    Lately, my joints have started aching . . .

  10. These have been mine for quite some time now:

     

    Vladimir Nabokov

    Virginia Woolf

    William Faulkner

    John Banville

    John LeCarré

    George Eliot

    Charles McCarry

    Marguerite Duras

    Marcel Proust

     

    and the most astoundingly wonderful of all, the equal of any, even if not well known:

     

    James Salter

  11. I'm not sure I've ever seen this thread before, where have I been? :roll:

     

    Okay, disclaimer: I read a lot of trash, so even my best picks are not without flaws! My 'Best of 2015' are really great reads, but as they're selected from a narrower range, they may or may not be quite as amazing as my Always picks. :lol: I'll come back and update this with more!

     

    Best of 2015:

     

    Off To Be The Wizard  - Scott Meyer (Gaming fantasy/humour)

    The Last Days of Rabbit Hayes - Anna McPartlin (Drama/Fiction)

    To Rise Again At A Decent Hour - Joshua Ferris (Weird semi-philosophical fiction, definitely also an all-time favourite.)

    The Martian - Andy Wier (sci-fi)

     

    Best of Always:

     

    Adult:

    The Book Thief - Markus Zusak

    Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell - Susanna Clarke

    The Magicians - Lev Grossman

    Vlad - C. C. Humphreys

    Flowers For Algernon - Daniel Keyes

    Salem's Lot - Stephen King

    Perfume - Patrick Suskind

    The Painted Man - Peter Brett

    Warm Bodies - Isaac Marion

     

    Young Adult:

    A Monster Calls - Patrick Ness

    Unwind - Neal Shusterman

    The Shell House - Linda Newbury

    Paper Towns - John Green

     

    Childrens:

    The Velveteen Rabbit - Margery Williams

    Nollaig, Glad to see your list, especially with its inclusion of The Martian and Flowers for Algernon as points of contact with my own list.  They should be on everyone's lists.

    Book Thief continues to puzzle me however.  It appears at the head of almost every list I see for best book of year etc, and seems to be enormously popular.  But it eludes me and leaves me flat, if not actually annoyed. I guess I just don't see in it what so many other people do.  But opinions will differ, so no big deal I suppose.

  12. Without a doubt, Red Sparrow by Jason Matthews is sidling onto my list of best books in a decade of reading.  A spy thriller with a highly trained cat secretly tracking a very educated mouse, the suspense carries from page to page in a way that I can't recall from other espionage books I have read.  Matthews is a master of the craft, having had a career with the CIA, and the detail on every page into both personal psychology and espionage tradecraft is absolutely remarkable and new to this reader.  He ranks with the masters and is very highly recommended to anyone.

  13. Commemorating a decade of membership and discussion in online book forums: my best-of-the-best books I have enjoyed.

     

    A Decade of Reading

    Lolita - Vladimir Nabokov
    Pnin - Vladimir Nabokov
    Look at the Harlequins - Vladimir Nabokov
    Mrs. Dalloway - Virginia Woolf
    The Waves - Virginia Woolf
    The Sea - John Banville
    Stoner - John Williams
    Absalom, Absalom! - William Faulkner
    Daniel Deronda - George Eliot
    The Lover - Marguerite Duras
    The Golden Notebook - Doris Lessing
    Catcher in the Rye - J.D. Salinger
    Franny and Zooey - J.D. Salinger
    The Stream of Life - Clarice Lispector
    Light Years - James Salter
    The Hunters - James Salter
    Gilead - Marilynne Robinson
    Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man - James Joyce
    Dreams of my Russian Summers - Andrei Makine
    Blood Meridian - Cormac McCarthy
    Casanova in Bolzano by Sandor Marai
    American Pastoral by Philip Roth
    The Universal Baseball Association - Robert Coover
    Your Face Tomorrow (3 v) - Javier Marias

     

    Spy, Detective, Terrorism
    The Untouchable - John Banville
    Harlot's Ghost - Norman Mailer
    The Smiley Series - John LeCarré
    I Am Pilgrim - Terry Hayes

     

    Sci Fi
    Malevil - Robert Merle
    On the Beach - Nevil Shute
    Contact - Carl Sagan
    Canticle for Leibowitz - Walter M. Miller, Jr.
    Flowers for Algernon - Daniel Keyes
    The Martian - Andy Weir

     

    Islam
    Orientalism - Edward Said
    From Beirut to Jerusalem - Thomas L. Friedman
    Mohammed, a Prophet for Our Time - Karen Armstrong
    The Truth About Mohammed - Robert Spencer
    American Islam - Paul M. Barrett
    Onward Muslim Soldiers - Robert Spencer

     

    Lit Crit
    Post-Modernist Fiction - Brian McHale

     

    Short Story
    The Lost Decade - F. Scott Fitzgerald

     

    Drama
    Waiting for Godot - Samuel Beckett
    Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf - Edward Albee

     

    Poetry
    The Classic 100 Poems
    - William Harmon, ed.

     

    Biography
    Salinger - David Shields

     

    Inspirational
    Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions - John Donne

     

    Thank you, everyone, for your friendship and an enjoyable experience.

    Sincerely

    Paul

  14. Late to the party, it has been a long time since I've been in a discussion of "50 Shades."

    Most of what I might have to say has probably already been said here, and elsewhere, so I'll restrict my comments to some not often heard.

     

    1. I bought the book to read it, and read the other two as well.  No apologies offered -- my own free will. 

    2. I have never seen a book where so many people who haven't read it have so many negative opinions about it.  Herd mentality in action.

    3. The book does have a plot. There is character development; There is a plot structure (introduction, rising action, climax, falling action, denoument).

    4. It has a happy ending for those who like happy endings.

    5. I have never heard so many people who are suddenly literary critics and judging the book to have poor writing. (When no comments are made about the quality of writing in all the other books people read.  I assume they must all have excellent writing).

    6. Many other erotic books have been mentioned as superior, without titles being given.  Titles, please!  (Bared to You is not. It is inferior).

    7. The book deserves its popularity, and she her money.

    8.  Whether it causes other people to read, I care not.

  15. I wouldn't continue reading if I wasn't enjoying it (it doesn't sound like a book I'd enjoy), but it can imagine though it's not nice to abandon a book. As for which 'award' it should get.. at least one of those! Have you read any other books this year that were as bad / nasty as this one?I'm sorry you aren't enjoying it :( I hope your next read will be a lot better!

    Probably not, now that you ask. Most in the category are just not interesting. This one is absolutely repulsive. My next read will definitely be better! :D

  16. Paul, on 03 Dec 2014 - 09:00 AM, said:Paul, on 03 Dec 2014 - 09:00 AM, said:

     Willoyd,

    Thanks for your kind welcome back.

     

    It really is difficult to pick "bests" isn't it?  More like excruciating, but I try to keep it to a single best in each category, and also try to keep from inventing too many new categories to fit them all in. :blush2:

     

    Yes, I did enjoy Madame Bovary, but the theme made me squirm.  It was much too excruciating for we who use credit cards.  Too modern! :o

     

    Gone Girl and Dinner?  Unfortunately I came across worse.  Morel was particularly disappointing, with such an intriguing title that I have seen so much of, and coming from such an author.  Or maybe it just went by me.

     

    But, the complete To Kill a Mockingbird will be sometime in the future.

     

    Just at the moment I am reading American Psycho.  What a book! What characters!  It may yet squeeze onto the Best list, somewhere, before 2014 is out.

     

    Hope you enjoy Pilgrim.  It is timely, at least.

     

    Upthread, in an unguarded moment, I mentioned that I was reading American Psycho. I may yet be sorry for confessing that initial interest. :doh:

    At first, and from whatever I have heard about it, I thought it was scathing parody of modern acquisitive American culture.  But too late I have found out that the protagonist is a misogynist serial killer. Sooo.... so far, at 30%, there has been a graphic bedroom scene, explicit to the point of bordering on porn -- depending on one's definition of porn.  And separately a mutilation that might turn one's stomach -- again depending on one's definition of stomach.  Plus a few murders 'way offstage.

    Up for grabs right now is the question of whether I'll continue on.  In the post-modern vein, the idea of any plot is still rather sketchy, and the (lack of) continuity is quite bizarre.

    At the moment I am leaning toward one of several decisions: Deferred, or Abandoned, and/or Worst of Year.

    Not Recommended for general reading, although I'll probably hang in a little to see if anything like a coherent story develops.

    I'll let you know.

    yech!

     

    PS Is the site a bit slow?

  17. Athena, on 05 Dec 2014 - 10:08 AM, said:

    Ah, that's pretty interesting, good luck :)!

     

    Thanks, you too.

     

    P.S. Is it weird that I sort of thought that you and Kate didn't have children, because I don't remember them being mentioned on this forum before :blush2:? It's okay if you and / or Kate don't want to talk about it though, I don't want to pry or anything! I'm sorry if my posts were to come across that way, I'm just surprised :).

     

    Umm, yes you are right, and you are not prying.  I have four children by a previous marriage, all grown, and Kate and I have none.  It's not a particular secret; just never thought to mention. 

×
×
  • Create New...