Jump to content

Korenith

Member
  • Posts

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Korenith

  1. Blind Guardian base pretty much all their music on some work of literature or other: Lord of the Rings, Peter Pan, Wheel of Time just to name a few.

     

    And as a few have mentioned Symphony X also like their epics. They did an album retelling Paradise Lost which is one of my favourite albums ever.

  2. Jaws is the first film I think of which I enjoyed more than the book. There is something about the subject matter which demands visuals and suspenseful music even though I read the book first as a kid (because I wasn't allowed to watch the movie).

     

    Also I enjoyed 2001: A Space Odyssey more as a film because it was so boundary pushing whereas the book is just a solid Sci-fi with a lot of the mystery taken away because Clarke decides to explain too much. 

  3. Thanks for the link Korenith :smile:

     

    Actually, to correct my earlier post, I didn't start with Consider Phlebas, my mistake.  My first was Feersum Endjinn.  It's probably still my favourite, just ahead of The Algebraist :smile:

     I loved the world in The Algebraist but the villain felt a little too cartoony for my tastes. I'd probably put it around the middle of the pack if I were doing a list of his best to worst novels.

  4. I have to side with the "Ulysses is a great work" camp. I don't agree at all that all art should be accessible because then what happens to people who really want a challenge and instead have to read stuff written for "everybody". Don't get me wrong, I don't think "difficult" necessarily means "good" but just as there should be books aimed at children so to should there be books written specifically with the academic community in mind and that's what Joyce did. He wrote for the people who studied literature and its conventions on a minute level so when you consider his goals yes Ulysses is absolutely a triumph because it totally succeeds.

     

    As far as what good writing "should" be goes, I think the whole concept is just wrong minded. There is no rule in writing that cannot be broken but only people who have done so with a good reason for doing it get remembered.

  5. This looks like a pretty good list though I will never understand why people like Paulo Coelho or why they picked Dead Air instead of The Bridge when they were chosing Iain Banks novels but nobody ever agree 100% with these lists. Here's what I've managed so far:

     

    Pre-1700

    992. Don Quixote – Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra

    1700s
     

    985. Moll Flanders – Daniel Defoe
    983. Gulliver’s Travels – Jonathan Swift 
     

    1800s
     

    931. Frankenstein – Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley
    916. The Fall of the House of Usher – Edgar Allan Poe
    911. The Pit and the Pendulum – Edgar Allan Poe
    909. The Purloined Letter – Edgar Allan Poe
    908. The Three Musketeers – Alexandre Dumas
    904. Jane Eyre – Charlotte Brontë
    902. Wuthering Heights – Emily Brontë
    900. Mary Barton – Elizabeth Gaskell 
    896. Moby-Dick – Herman Melville
    876. Great Expectations – Charles Dickens
    868. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland – Lewis Carroll 
    867. Crime and Punishment – Fyodor Dostoevsky 
    866. Journey to the Centre of the Earth – Jules Verne
    848. Around the World in Eighty Days – Jules Verne
    825. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn – Mark Twain 
    820. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde – Robert Louis Stevenson 
    809. The Picture of Dorian Gray – Oscar Wilde 
    804. The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes – Sir Arthur Conan Doyle 
    801. The Yellow Wallpaper – Charlotte Perkins Gilman
    799. Jude the Obscure – Thomas Hardy
    794. Dracula – Bram Stoker
    789. The Turn of the Screw – Henry James
    788. The Awakening – Kate Chopin 

    1900s

    781. The Hound of the Baskervilles – Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
    780. Heart of Darkness – Joseph Conrad 
    773. Nostromo – Joseph Conrad
    769. The Forsyte Sage – John Galsworthy
    761. A Room With a View – E.M. Forster
    748. The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists – Robert Tressell
    741. Of Human Bondage – William Somerset Maugham 
    736. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man – James Joyce
    731. The Return of the Soldier – Rebecca West
    728. Women in Love – D.H. Lawrence
    723. Ulysses – James Joyce
    701. The Trial – Franz Kafka 
    699. The Great Gatsby – F. Scott Fitzgerald
    698. Mrs. Dalloway – Virginia Woolf 
    687. Tarka the Otter – Henry Williamson
    686. To The Lighthouse – Virginia Woolf 
    671. The Sound and the Fury – William Faulkner
    663. A Farewell to Arms – Ernest Hemingway
    649. Brave New World – Aldous Huxley
    647. A Scots Quair (Sunset Song) – Lewis Grassic Gibbon
    636. Tropic of Cancer – Henry Miller
    623. At the Mountains of Madness – H.P. Lovecraft
    622. Absalom, Absalom! – William Faulkner
    610. The Hobbit – J.R.R. Tolkien
    608. Of Mice and Men – John Steinbeck
    607. Murphy – Samuel Beckett
    605. Brighton Rock – Graham Greene
    603. Rebecca – Daphne du Maurier 
    593. Finnegans Wake – James Joyce
    592. The Grapes of Wrath – John Steinbeck
    587. For Whom the Bell Tolls – Ernest Hemingway
    564. Animal Farm – George Orwell
    559. The Plague – Albert Camus
    547. Nineteen Eighty-Four – George Orwell
    538. The Grass is Singing – Doris Lessing
    531. Molloy – Samuel Beckett
    529. The Catcher in the Rye – J.D. Salinger
    527. Foundation – Isaac Asimov
    526. Day of the Triffids – John Wyndham
    525. Malone Dies – Samuel Beckett
    514. Lucky Jim – Kingsley Amis
    512. The Unnamable – Samuel Beckett
    508. Lord of the Flies – William Golding
    494. The Lord of the Rings – J.R.R. Tolkien 
    490. The Lonely Londoners – Sam Selvon
    484. On the Road – Jack Kerouac
    481. The Midwich Cuckoos – John Wyndham
    473. Saturday Night and Sunday Morning – Alan Sillitoe
    472. Things Fall Apart – Chinua Achebe
    456. To Kill a Mockingbird – Harper Lee
    451. Catch-22 – Joseph Heller 
    450. The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie – Muriel Spark
    445. Franny and Zooey – J.D. Salinger
    440. The Golden Notebook – Doris Lessing
    437. A Clockwork Orange – Anthony Burgess
    436. One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest – Ken Kesey
    433. The Bell Jar – Sylvia Plath
    413. The Crying of Lot 49 – Thomas Pynchon 
    411. Wide Sargasso Sea – Jean Rhys
    409. The Magus – John Fowles 
    399. One Hundred Years of Solitude - Gabriel García Márquez
    390. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? – Philip K. Dick
    389. 2001: A Space Odyssey – Arthur C. Clarke
    376. The French Lieutenant’s Woman – John Fowles
    375. Slaughterhouse Five – Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
    358. Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas – Hunter S. Thompson
    354. Surfacing – Margaret Atwood
    345. Crash – J.G. Ballard
    320. Interview With the Vampire – Anne Rice
    312. The Shining – Stephen King
    310. The Passion of New Eve – Angela Carter
    302. The Cement Garden – Ian McEwan
    301. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy – Douglas Adams 
    291. Confederacy of Dunces – John Kennedy Toole
    288. Midnight’s Children – Salman Rushdie
    283. The Comfort of Strangers – Ian McEwan
    282. Lanark: A Life in Four Books – Alasdair Gray
    274. A Pale View of Hills – Kazuo Ishiguro 
    272. The Color Purple – Alice Walker
    265. Waterland – Graham Swift
    260. Money: A Suicide Note – Martin Amis
    258. Neuromancer – William Gibson
    255. Nights at the Circus – Angela Carter
    254. The Wasp Factory – Iain Banks
    253. Empire of the Sun – J.G. Ballard
    243. Perfume – Patrick Süskind
    242. The Handmaid’s Tale – Margaret Atwood
    240. Less Than Zero – Bret Easton Ellis
    237. Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit – Jeanette Winterson
    236. Love in the Time of Cholera – Gabriel García Márquez 
    227. Watchmen – Alan Moore & David Gibbons
    222. Beloved – Toni Morrison 
    216. The Child in Time – Ian McEwan
    215. The Pigeon – Patrick Süskind
    208. Nervous Conditions – Tsitsi Dangarembga
    207. The Player of Games – Iain M. Banks
    203. The Satanic Verses – Salman Rushdie
    200. Foucault’s Pendulum – Umberto Eco
    199. Cat’s Eye – Margaret Atwood
    190. Remains of the Day – Kazuo Ishiguro 
    187. Sexing the Cherry – Jeanette Winterson
    186. A Disaffection – James Kelman
    184. The Buddha of Suburbia – Hanif Kureishi 
    170. Regeneration – Pat Barker
    167. Time’s Arrow – Martin Amis
    166. American Psycho – Bret Easton Ellis
    153. The Crow Road – Iain Banks 
    138. Complicity – Iain Banks 
    135. Birdsong – Sebastian Faulks 
    134. Trainspotting – Irvine Welsh
    129. Captain Corelli’s Mandolin – Louis de Bernieres
    128. How Late It Was, How Late – James Kelman
    125. The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle – Haruki Murakami 
    112. The Information – Martin Amis
    109. Alias Grace – Margaret Atwood 
    96. Underworld – Don DeLillo
    95. Enduring Love – Ian McEwan
    94. Great Apes – Will Self
    93. Memoirs of a Geisha – Arthur Golden
    90. Veronika Decides to Die – Paulo Coelho
    87. Glamorama – Bret Easton Ellis
    81. Amsterdam – Ian McEwan
     

    2000s

    63. The Blind Assassin – Margaret Atwood
    54. White Teeth – Zadie Smith 
    49. Life of Pi – Yann Martel
    48. Choke – Chuck Palahniuk
    42. Atonement – Ian McEwan
    35. Dead Air – Iain Banks
    24. Fingersmith – Sarah Waters
    19. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time – Mark Haddon
    13. Cloud Atlas – David Mitchell 
    2. Saturday – Ian McEwan
    1. Never Let Me Go – Kazuo Ishiguro

  6. I agree, I've probably said it in this thread before but I'm looking forward to re-reading the book some day, to see all the things I either missed or misinterpreted. It's still my only Banks though, I should get to reading more books by him.

     

    I recommend The Crow Road, Complicity or The Bridge though The Bridge can be a bit weird for some people so you might want to check out some reviews in case it isn't to your taste.

  7. I've never read his books. Are they worth reading? What are his novels generally about?

     

    They are Sci-fi set in a techno-utopia for the most part and they deal with how The Culture (the utopians) react and deal with other societies with different views from their own. They tend to be about things like human rights and what it means to be human but they have a fair bit of action in some places and lots of speculation about what new technology might ultimately be used for. If that sounds like your kind of thing then Player of Games seems to be what most people recommend as a start point. They are all set in the same universe but there is almost no character or story overlap bar the odd few mentions here and there so you can read them in whatever order you like (with the exception of Surface Detail which has a direct link to Use of Weapons)

  8. So general consensus is Player of Games is a good start point. I think I agree since some of his later ones can get a bit heavy on the technology side of things which for Sci-fi newbies might get boring. I want to say Consider Phlebas but as Karsa and Athena both said, it's one of his weaker ones so might put people off.

     

    Use of Weapons and Surface Detail are my other two favourites. I think UoW is a good follow up/digging deeper book if somebody liked the first one and then SD and Feersum Endjinn as ones for people who really get into his style because whilst they are harder reads they are also really good.

  9. This is a question for all the people who read Iain M. Banks. I'm currently writing a "Getting Into" article for my blog on him that gives people a place to start getting into his work and then a few ideas on where to go afterwards. The question is Where did you start? And which of his books do you think works as the best introduction?

     

    Sci-fi only please since I've already done a "Getting Into" for his mainstream work.

  10. It might be a good idea to start with some short stories. Stephen King has some good collections if you like your horror at all. Skeleton Crew is my favourite collection but most of them have good stuff in them. 

     

    I also agree with Chrissy. Starting with a few tv shows or films you enjoy that are based on books can make getting into reading a lot easier. Fight Club or I Am Legend for example are excellent books and quite short, only a couple of hundred pages. 

  11. I read Beloved and thought it was excellent but as others have said it can be heavy going at times. The style is very abstract and fragmented at times which as an effect is very clever but doesn't make for easy reading. I enjoyed her work enough to want more though and I have Sula on my to read pile near the top.

  12. Murakami is a name I've seen and heard floating around for a while. Until recently though all I knew was that he was a Japanese writer who wrote books which everybody loved, be it critics or a bloke I met down the pub and there was one novel of his which kept being mentioned. "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle."

     

    Wind-Up+Bird2.jpg

     

    Hype is often a cruel force. You hear so much about how good a book is, how the style is so well polished, how interesting the concept is, the comparisons with other writers you love only to have it turn into a hideous disappointment. It's tough for any novel to live up to that kind of expectation.

     

    Happily I get to say that this time the Hype-Machine got to trundle on its merry way, completely oblivious to the hundreds of hidden pitfalls it could have plunged into. "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" is a brilliant novel which sketches in stark language the crushing isolation which lurks beneath the surface of contemporary Japanese culture. It really does deserve the praise it's been getting since it was first published in 1994.

     

    So, what is it about then? As with a lot of novels it is fairly difficult to explain and the blurb just confuses the matter but I'll do my best. It is a magical realist novel in a similar sort of vein as "One Hundred Years of Solitude" where the magical aspects remain below the surface for the majority of its six hundred odd pages but contribute to a sense of dislocation from reality which seems to be the story's soul.

     

    The central character, Toru Okada, is a man who has just quit an unfulfilling job in order to take stock of his life and give it new direction and purpose but he finds that his wife is growing distant and that family issues which he believed to be dealt with have started to re-emerge. What follows is an exploration of the worlds and people forced to the margins of Japanese society as Okada acts as a conduit for a host of other stories told by a bizarre mix of characters, all with their own dark and sometimes eccentric pasts. These characters range from a psychic investigator who refuses to be paid for her work to a teenage girl who has an obsession with the morbid and their stories encompass subjects as diverse as spirituality, war guilt and the world of fashion. This has the potential to turn them into "quirky" characters, a phrase loved by publicists but often meaning shallow empty people who have one weird characteristic which makes an otherwise uninteresting person supposedly fascinating, but nothing feels forced and all the oddities are tied cleverly into the Murakami's main themes.

     

    As you would expect from its wide scope this is a novel which jumps around a fair bit between stories but the narrative has a natural flow which carries you along. Murakami is not a stylist so his prose is often stark and bleak (but not Cormac MacCarthy stark and bleak). He does a wonderful job of creating a world which you feel entirely immersed in through an accumulation of quiet, reflective moments.

     

    There is one thing which as a potential reader you should be aware of though. Though surrounded by strong personalities Okada himself is a very passive character for the most part and as such you are unlikely to engage him as you would a more forceful protagonist. This is, I think, deliberate on Murakami's part as this passivity is directly linked to the isolation which pervades the novel but it inevitably means that as a reader you are less emotionally invested in his struggle than you might otherwise be. 

     

    That small potential issue aside though "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" is well worth your time, particularly for fans of writers like Salman Rushdie or Gabriel Garcia Marquez.

     

    Rating: 9/10

  13. Personally I think it's genius. Very very dark as people have pointed out but everything is so well written and so convincing in its insanity. Its also his best along with The Bridge and Use of Weapons.

     

    And the other thing about it is that rereading it is a really good idea. Once you know the twist you can see the really clever way Banks has patterned Frank's thoughts and voice, all the clues you missed. Would definitely be in my top 100 novels of all time.

  14. A lot of the ones I wanted to say have already been mentioned but Ian Irvine is a writer I really find incredible in the fantasy genre. Complicated world and characters with none of the usual black/white good/evil stuff.

     

    A View from the Mirror is the first series but the second series (Well of Echoes) is much better I thought and it's set 200 years after the first so there is no continuity you need to be aware of if you want to start there instead.

×
×
  • Create New...